BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17036438)

  • 1. Protecting human subjects in the NIH's Intramural Research Program: a draft instrument to evaluate convened meetings of its IRBs.
    Wichman A; Kalyan DN; Abbott LJ; Wesley R; Sandler AL
    IRB; 2006; 28(3):7-10. PubMed ID: 17036438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects.
    Moore DL
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The need to understand IRB deliberations.
    Candilis PJ; Lidz CW; Arnold RM
    IRB; 2006; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16680872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exempt research: procedures in the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health.
    Wichman A; Mills D; Sandler AL
    IRB; 1996; 18(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 11654755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
    Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A pilot project: bioethics consultants as non-voting members of IRBs at the National Institutes of Health.
    DeRenzo EG; Wichman A
    IRB; 1990; 12(6):6-8. PubMed ID: 11651266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introduction to special issue of Accountability in Research on the review and approval of biomedical research proposals: a call for a centralized national human research protections system.
    Mann H; Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 2006; 13(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16770856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Just-in-time IRB review: capitalizing on scientific merit review to improve human subjects research compliance.
    Kelly PA; Johnson ML
    IRB; 2005; 27(2):6-10. PubMed ID: 15948325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioethics consultants to the National Institutes of Health's intramural IRB system: the continuing evolution.
    DeRenzo EG; Bonkovsky FO
    IRB; 1993; 15(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 11652155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Institutional review boards and institutions not doing enough to protect human subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jun; 15(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 12199292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study.
    Hearnshaw H
    BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7432):140-1. PubMed ID: 14726341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SACHRP recommendations for review of children's research requiring DHHS secretary's approval.
    Fisher CB; Kornetsky SZ
    IRB; 2005; 27(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 16021795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accreditation and certification for human research protection programs.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Nov; 16(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 11883458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research oversight through new lenses: the consortium to examine clinical research ethics.
    Sugarman J; Eckenwiler LA; Emanuel EJ
    IRB; 2003; 25(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 12833899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
    Wichman A
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Descriptive ethics: a qualitative study of local research ethics committees in Mexico.
    Valdez-Martinez E; Turnbull B; Garduño-Espinosa J; Porter JD
    Dev World Bioeth; 2006 May; 6(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 16594973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based practice of research ethics review?
    Beagan B; McDonald M
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):62-8. PubMed ID: 16459416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Federal report says protection of human subjects is threatened by numerous factors.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1996 May; 11(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
    Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
    PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.