82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17036776)
1. Motion preservation technologies: alternatives to spinal fusion.
Singh K; An HS
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 Sep; 35(9):411-6. PubMed ID: 17036776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery.
Huang RC; Girardi FP; Lim MR; Cammisa FP
Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 15950686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty.
Cunningham BW
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):219S-230S. PubMed ID: 15541670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design and evaluation of the FlexiCore metal-on-metal intervertebral disc prosthesis.
Valdevit A; Errico TJ
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):276S-288S. PubMed ID: 15541677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of total disc arthroplasty: a canine model.
Taylor BA; Okubadejo GO; Patel AA; Talcott MR; Imamura T; Hu N; Cunningham BW
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Apr; 37(4):E64-70. PubMed ID: 18535683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial disc prosthesis: design concepts and criteria.
Lee CK; Goel VK
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):209S-218S. PubMed ID: 15541669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Controversial topics in surgery: degenerative disc disease: disc replacement. For.
Wilson-MacDonald J; Boeree N
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 Jan; 89(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17316511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanics of nonfusion implants.
Huang RC; Wright TM; Panjabi MM; Lipman JD
Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 15950687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intervertebral disc prostheses.
Guyer RD; Ohnmeiss DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15 Suppl):S15-23. PubMed ID: 12897469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumbar disc arthroplasty: a critical review.
Resnick DK; Watters WC
Clin Neurosurg; 2007; 54():83-7. PubMed ID: 18504901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stiffness of prosthetic nucleus determines stiffness of reconstructed lumbar calf disc.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP
Spine J; 2004; 4(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 15125847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis.
Anderson PA; Sasso RC; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1305-12. PubMed ID: 18496341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.
Denozière G; Ku DN
J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 16439247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
