BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17036842)

  • 1. Population similarity of enterococci and Escherichia coil in surface waters: A predictive tool to trace the sources of fecal contamination.
    Ahmed W; Neller R; Katouli M
    J Water Health; 2006 Sep; 4(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 17036842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Host species-specific metabolic fingerprint database for enterococci and Escherichia coli and its application to identify sources of fecal contamination in surface waters.
    Ahmed W; Neller R; Katouli M
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Aug; 71(8):4461-8. PubMed ID: 16085837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence of septic system failure determined by a bacterial biochemical fingerprinting method.
    Ahmed W; Neller R; Katouli M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(4):910-20. PubMed ID: 15752338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enterococcus and Escherichia coli fecal source apportionment with microbial source tracking genetic markers--is it feasible?
    Wang D; Farnleitner AH; Field KG; Green HC; Shanks OC; Boehm AB
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6849-61. PubMed ID: 23890872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches.
    Cloutier DD; McLellan SL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 83(4):. PubMed ID: 27940538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semi-quantitative evaluation of fecal contamination potential by human and ruminant sources using multiple lines of evidence.
    Stoeckel DM; Stelzer EA; Stogner RW; Mau DP
    Water Res; 2011 May; 45(10):3225-44. PubMed ID: 21513966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abundance and characteristics of the recreational water quality indicator bacteria Escherichia coli and enterococci in gull faeces.
    Fogarty LR; Haack SK; Wolcott MJ; Whitman RL
    J Appl Microbiol; 2003; 94(5):865-78. PubMed ID: 12694452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of fecal pollution in Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
    Xue J; Lin S; Lamar FG; Lamori JG; Sherchan S
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 Apr; 129(2):655-663. PubMed ID: 29126560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Occurrence of fecal indicator bacteria in urban surface water: a case study in southern China].
    Sun F; Sha J; Liu YH
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2012 Nov; 33(11):3778-86. PubMed ID: 23323406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population similarity analysis of indicator bacteria for source prediction of faecal pollution in a coastal lake.
    Ahmed W; Hargreaves M; Goonetilleke A; Katouli M
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2008 Aug; 56(8):1469-75. PubMed ID: 18561957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enterococci vs coliforms as a possible fecal contamination indicator: baseline data for Karachi.
    Hussain M; Rasool SA; Khan MT; Wajid A
    Pak J Pharm Sci; 2007 Apr; 20(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17416563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sources and fate of Salmonella and fecal indicator bacteria in an urban creek.
    Sassoubre LM; Walters SP; Russell TL; Boehm AB
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Aug; 13(8):2206-12. PubMed ID: 21687857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling the dry-weather tidal cycling of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters of an intertidal wetland.
    Sanders BF; Arega F; Sutula M
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3394-408. PubMed ID: 16051310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microbial source tracking in impaired watersheds using PhyloChip and machine-learning classification.
    Dubinsky EA; Butkus SR; Andersen GL
    Water Res; 2016 Nov; 105():56-64. PubMed ID: 27598696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical stratification and seasonality of fecal indicator bacteria in New York City playground sandboxes.
    Leri AC; Fassihi GE; Lundquist MJ; Khan M; Arguin ML
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Mar; 273():116152. PubMed ID: 38417319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microbial source tracking in a coastal California watershed reveals canines as controllable sources of fecal contamination.
    Ervin JS; Van De Werfhorst LC; Murray JL; Holden PA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9043-52. PubMed ID: 25055204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meteorological effects on the levels of fecal indicator bacteria in an urban stream: a modeling approach.
    Cho KH; Cha SM; Kang JH; Lee SW; Park Y; Kim JW; Kim JH
    Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2189-202. PubMed ID: 20138642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sourcing faecal pollution: a combination of library-dependent and library-independent methods to identify human faecal pollution in non-sewered catchments.
    Ahmed W; Stewart J; Gardner T; Powell D; Brooks P; Sullivan D; Tindale N
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3771-9. PubMed ID: 17482658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fecal indicator bacteria levels at beaches in the Florida Keys after Hurricane Irma.
    Roca MA; Brown RS; Solo-Gabriele HM
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 Jan; 138():266-273. PubMed ID: 30660273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fecal indicators and zoonotic pathogens in household drinking water taps fed from rainwater tanks in Southeast Queensland, Australia.
    Ahmed W; Hodgers L; Sidhu JP; Toze S
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2012 Jan; 78(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 22020514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.