216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17038002)
1. Benefit sharing: from obscurity to common knowledge.
Schroeder D
Dev World Bioeth; 2006 Dec; 6(3):ii. PubMed ID: 17038002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sharing the benefits of genetic resources: from biodiversity to human genetics.
Schroeder D; Lasén-Díaz C
Dev World Bioeth; 2006 Dec; 6(3):135-43. PubMed ID: 17038005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ensuring access to the outcomes of community resource projects.
Silverthorne J
Plant Physiol; 2003 Aug; 132(4):1775-8. PubMed ID: 12913135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biodiversity, biopiracy and benefits: what allegations of biopiracy tell us about intellectual property.
Hamilton C
Dev World Bioeth; 2006 Dec; 6(3):158-73. PubMed ID: 17038007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Women in developing countries and benefit sharing.
Alvarez-Castillo F; Feinholz D
Dev World Bioeth; 2006 Dec; 6(3):113-21. PubMed ID: 17038003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefit sharing: it's time for a definition.
Schroeder D
J Med Ethics; 2007 Apr; 33(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 17400617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vicissitudes of benefit sharing of crop genetic resources: downstream and upstream.
Jonge BD; Korthals M
Dev World Bioeth; 2006 Dec; 6(3):144-57. PubMed ID: 17038006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How should the benefits of bioprospecting be shared?
Millum J
Hastings Cent Rep; 2010; 40(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 20169653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural resources: bioprospects less than golden.
Dalton R
Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6992):598-600. PubMed ID: 15190324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.
Schüklenk U; Kleinsmidt A
Dev World Bioeth; 2006 Dec; 6(3):122-34. PubMed ID: 17038004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shared ownership of biological resources.
Dharma Rajan P; Divakaran P
Science; 2009 May; 324(5930):1014-5. PubMed ID: 19460983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Population genetic studies: is there an emerging legal obligation to share benefits?
Sheremeta L
Health Law Rev; 2003; 12(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 15742495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA as taxable property - the elephant in the room or a red herring?
Hunter KG
Eur J Health Law; 2006 Sep; 13(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 17190351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The scope of utility in the twenty-first century: new guidance for gene-related patents.
Summers TM
Georgetown Law J; 2003 Jan; 91(2):475-509. PubMed ID: 15046071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cultural challenges to biotechnology: Native American genetic resources and the concept of cultural harm.
Tsosie R
J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(3):396-411. PubMed ID: 17714250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A global biodiversity fund to implement distributive justice for genetic resources.
Deplazes-Zemp A
Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Dec; 19(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 31091552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioprospecting, genetic patenting and indigenous populations: challenges under a restructured information commons.
Faye DJ
J World Intellect Prop; 2004 May; 7(3):401-28. PubMed ID: 16755699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hope fear and genetics: judicial responses to biotechnology.
Gold ER
Judicature; 1999; 83(3):132-8. PubMed ID: 12737164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Boosting bioprospects.
Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6992):585. PubMed ID: 15190313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Global biological resources. Could access requirements stifle your research?
Jinnah S; Jungcurt S
Science; 2009 Jan; 323(5913):464-5. PubMed ID: 19164733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]