These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

550 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17039348)

  • 1. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution.
    Suttner S; Schöllhorn T; Boldt J; Mayer J; Röhm KD; Lang K; Piper SN
    Intensive Care Med; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2053-8. PubMed ID: 17039348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.
    Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy of bioimpedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output in comparison with thermodilution method.
    Wong KL; Hou PC
    Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1996 Jun; 34(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 9084523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution.
    Doering L; Lum E; Dracup K; Friedman A
    Crit Care Med; 1995 Oct; 23(10):1667-73. PubMed ID: 7587231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equivalence of bioimpedance and thermodilution in measuring cardiac index after cardiac surgery.
    Sageman WS; Riffenburgh RH; Spiess BD
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2002 Feb; 16(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 11854871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration.
    Manecke GR; Auger WR
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Feb; 21(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 17289472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
    Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique.
    Maass SW; Roekaerts PM; Lancé MD
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Jun; 28(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 24746334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and electrical velocimetry cardiac output measurements.
    Heringlake M; Handke U; Hanke T; Eberhardt F; Schumacher J; Gehring H; Heinze H
    Intensive Care Med; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2168-72. PubMed ID: 17690864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients.
    Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thermodilution vs pressure recording analytical method in hemodynamic stabilized patients.
    Donati A; Carsetti A; Tondi S; Scorcella C; Domizi R; Damiani E; Gabbanelli V; Münch C; Adrario E; Pelaia P; Cecconi M
    J Crit Care; 2014 Apr; 29(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 24332994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution in patients post open-heart surgery.
    Zácek P; Kunes P; Kobzová E; Dominik J
    Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 1999; 42(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 10566176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiac output can be reliably measured noninvasively after coronary artery bypass grafting operation.
    Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM
    Crit Care Med; 1999 Oct; 27(10):2206-11. PubMed ID: 10548208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device.
    Spiess BD; Patel MA; Soltow LO; Wright IH
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2001 Oct; 15(5):567-73. PubMed ID: 11687996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation.
    Shoemaker WC; Wo CC; Bishop MH; Appel PL; Van de Water JM; Harrington GR; Wang X; Patil RS
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1907-12. PubMed ID: 7988125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients: comparison with thermodilution method.
    Gujjar AR; Muralidhar K; Banakal S; Gupta R; Sathyaprabha TN; Jairaj PS
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2008 Jun; 22(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 18418719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous comparison of thoracic bioimpedance and arterial pulse waveform-derived cardiac output with thermodilution measurement.
    Hirschl MM; Kittler H; Woisetschläger C; Siostrzonek P; Staudinger T; Kofler J; Oschatz E; Bur A; Gwechenberger M; Laggner AN
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Jun; 28(6):1798-802. PubMed ID: 10890622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of Continuous Cardiac Output Measurement With the LiDCOplus System During Intra-Aortic Counterpulsation After Cardiac Surgery.
    Menger J; Mora B; Skhirtladze K; Fischer A; Jan Ankersmit H; Dworschak M
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Jun; 30(3):592-8. PubMed ID: 26718662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac index assessment by the pressure recording analytic method in critically ill unstable patients after cardiac surgery.
    Barile L; Landoni G; Pieri M; Ruggeri L; Maj G; Nigro Neto C; Pasin L; Cabrini L; Zangrillo A
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1108-13. PubMed ID: 23992652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].
    Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.