These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17039825)

  • 1. Comprehensive Family Services and customer satisfaction outcomes.
    Huebner RA; Jones BL; Miller VP; Custer M; Critchfield B
    Child Welfare; 2006; 85(4):691-714. PubMed ID: 17039825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Engaging families in child welfare services: an evidence-based approach to best practice.
    Dawson K; Berry M
    Child Welfare; 2002; 81(2):293-317. PubMed ID: 12014470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parental views of in-home services: what predicts satisfaction with child welfare workers?
    Chapman MV; Gibbons CB; Barth RP; McCrae JS;
    Child Welfare; 2003; 82(5):571-96. PubMed ID: 14524426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing the safety of children in foster care and family support programs: automated critical incident reporting.
    Brenner E; Freundlich M
    Child Welfare; 2006; 85(3):611-32. PubMed ID: 16999387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of state TANF policy decisions on kinship care providers.
    Anderson SG
    Child Welfare; 2006; 85(4):715-36. PubMed ID: 17039826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Child welfare services and delinquency: the need to know more.
    Jonson-Reid M
    Child Welfare; 2004; 83(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 15068217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fostering solutions: bringing brief-therapy principles and practices to the child welfare system.
    Flemons D; Liscio M; Gordon AB; Hibel J; Gutierrez-Hersh A; Rebholz CL
    J Marital Fam Ther; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20074126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The future of child and family welfare: selected readings.
    Maluccio AN
    Child Welfare; 2000; 79(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 10659395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Co-production dynamics and time dollar programs in community-based child welfare initiatives for hard-to-serve youth and families.
    Marks MB; Lawson HA
    Child Welfare; 2005; 84(2):209-32. PubMed ID: 15828409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does family group decision making affect child welfare outcomes? Findings from a randomized control study.
    Berzin SC; Cohen E; Thomas K; Dawson WC
    Child Welfare; 2008; 87(4):35-54. PubMed ID: 19391466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Court-ordered foster family care reform: a case study.
    Mushlin MB; Levitt L; Anderson L
    Child Welfare; 1986; 65(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 3956309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Australian women and foster care: a feminist perspective.
    Smith B
    Child Welfare; 1991; 70(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 2036872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can't do it alone: housing collaborations to improve foster youth outcomes.
    Choca MJ; Minoff J; Angene L; Byrnes M; Kenneally L; Norris D; Pearn D; Rivers MM
    Child Welfare; 2004; 83(5):469-92. PubMed ID: 15503642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The context of child welfare performance measures.
    Carnochan S; Samples M; Lawson J; Austin MJ
    J Evid Based Soc Work; 2013; 10(3):147-60. PubMed ID: 23705647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A model of culture-centered child welfare practice.
    Miller OA; Gaston RJ
    Child Welfare; 2003; 82(2):235-50. PubMed ID: 12699286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision-making in child protective services: a comparison of selected risk-assessment systems.
    Doueck HJ; English DJ; DePanfilis D; Moote GT
    Child Welfare; 1993; 72(5):441-52. PubMed ID: 8404248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Organizational climate, services, and outcomes in child welfare systems.
    Glisson C; Green P
    Child Abuse Negl; 2011 Aug; 35(8):582-91. PubMed ID: 21855998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Achieving timely adoption.
    Carnochan S; Moore M; Austin MJ
    J Evid Based Soc Work; 2013; 10(3):210-9. PubMed ID: 23705651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating multidisciplinary child abuse and neglect teams: a research agenda.
    Lalayants M; Epstein I
    Child Welfare; 2005; 84(4):433-58. PubMed ID: 16117258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partitioning the adoption process to better predict permanency.
    McDonald T; Press A; Billings P; Moore T
    Child Welfare; 2007; 86(3):5-32. PubMed ID: 17722679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.