116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17040417)
1. Outcomes of low-vision services using optometric and multidisciplinary approaches: a non-randomized comparison.
de Boer MR; Twisk J; Moll AC; Völker-Dieben HJ; de Vet HC; van Rens GH
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Nov; 26(6):535-44. PubMed ID: 17040417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applying multilevel item response theory to vision-related quality of life in Dutch visually impaired elderly.
van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Langelaan M; de Boer MR; Terwee CB; van Rens GH
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):710-20. PubMed ID: 17700335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed.
de Boer MR; de Vet HC; Terwee CB; Moll AC; Völker-Dieben HJ; van Rens GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1260-8. PubMed ID: 16291470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires: the LVQOL and VCM1.
de Boer MR; Terwee CB; de Vet HC; Moll AC; Völker-Dieben HJ; van Rens GH
Qual Life Res; 2006 Mar; 15(2):233-48. PubMed ID: 16468079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multilevel item response theory model was investigated for longitudinal vision-related quality-of-life data.
van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Neve HJ; van Rens GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):321-30. PubMed ID: 19766455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Thai, Low Vision Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (LVQOL).
Yingyong P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Dec; 90(12):2658-61. PubMed ID: 18386717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of low-vision rehabilitation on participation in daily living and quality of life.
Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Rees G; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1476-82. PubMed ID: 17389474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vision-related quality of life Core Measure (VCM1) showed low-impact differential item functioning between groups with different administration modes.
van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Mokkink LB; Comijs HC; Deeg DJ; van Rens GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1232-41. PubMed ID: 20413266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reading performance with low-vision aids and vision-related quality of life after macular translocation surgery in patients with age-related macular degeneration.
Nguyen NX; Besch D; Bartz-Schmidt K; Gelisken F; Trauzettel-Klosinski S
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Dec; 85(8):877-82. PubMed ID: 17651462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring low vision service outcomes: Rasch analysis of the seven-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.
Ryan B; Court H; Margrain TH
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Feb; 85(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18296928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geriatric optometry questionnaire.
Lightman JM; Rosenbloom AA
J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Jun; 62(6):472-4. PubMed ID: 1813543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of the 10-item vision core measure 1 (VCM1) scale (the Core Module of the Vision-Related Quality of Life scale) using Rasch analysis.
Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K; Pallant JF; Rees G; Hassell JB; Caudle LE; Keeffe JE
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(4):224-33. PubMed ID: 18780255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing participation in daily living and the effectiveness of rehabiliation in age related macular degeneration patients using the impact of vision impairment scale.
Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Tennant A; Rees G; O'Connor PM; Keeffe JE
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 18432494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized controlled trial on the effects of CCTV training on quality of life, depression, and adaptation to vision loss.
Burggraaff MC; van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Ringens PJ; van Rens GH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 53(7):3645-52. PubMed ID: 22562505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the value of low-vision services.
Raasch TW; Leat SJ; Kleinstein RN; Bullimore MA; Cutter GR
J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 May; 68(5):287-95. PubMed ID: 9170794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of low vision services in improving patient quality of life at Aravind Eye Hospital.
Do AT; Ilango K; Ramasamy D; Kalidasan S; Balakrishnan V; Chang RT
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 62(12):1125-31. PubMed ID: 25579355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT): design and methodology.
Stelmack JA; Tang XC; Reda DJ; Moran D; Rinne S; Mancil RM; Cummings R; Mancil G; Stroupe K; Ellis N; Massof RW
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):650-60. PubMed ID: 18042574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting the need for low vision rehabilitation services.
O'Connor PM; Lamoureux EL; Keeffe JE
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 18227205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vision- and health-related quality of life before and after vision restoration training in cerebrally damaged patients.
Gall C; Mueller I; Gudlin J; Lindig A; Schlueter D; Jobke S; Franke GH; Sabel BA
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2008; 26(4-5):341-53. PubMed ID: 18997310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of general health status on validity of visual impairment measurement.
Ahmadian L; Massof R
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(5):345-55. PubMed ID: 18850472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
