These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17040646)

  • 1. [Safety-engineered devices to prevent percutaneous injuries: cost-effectiveness analysis on prevention of high-risk exposure].
    Armadans Gil L; Fernández Cano MI; Albero Andrés I; Anglés Mellado ML; Sánchez García JM; Campins Martí M; Vaqué Rafart J
    Gac Sanit; 2006; 20(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 17040646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Safety-Engineered Devices.
    Fukuda H; Moriwaki K
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1012-21. PubMed ID: 27226284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a safety resheathable winged steel needle for prevention of percutaneous injuries associated with intravascular-access procedures among healthcare workers.
    Mendelson MH; Lin-Chen BY; Solomon R; Bailey E; Kogan G; Goldbold J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 12602692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Costs associated with sharps injuries in the Swedish health care setting and potential cost savings from needle-stick prevention devices with needle and syringe.
    Glenngård AH; Persson U
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2009; 41(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 19229763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-benefit evaluation of a preventive intervention on the biological risk in health: the accidental puncture during the administration of insulin in the University Hospital "Federico II" of Naples.
    Montella E; Schiavone D; Apicella L; Di Silverio P; Gaudiosi M; Ambrosone E; Moscaritolo E; Triassi M
    Ann Ig; 2014; 26(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 24998218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic benefits of safety-engineered sharp devices in Belgium - a budget impact model.
    Hanmore E; Maclaine G; Garin F; Alonso A; Leroy N; Ruff L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Nov; 13():489. PubMed ID: 24274747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infectious risk for healthcare workers: evaluation and prevention.
    Triassi M; Pennino F
    Ann Ig; 2018; 30(4 Supple 1):48-51. PubMed ID: 30062380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of the introduction of an engineered sharps injury prevention device on the percutaneous injury rate in healthcare workers.
    Azar-Cavanagh M; Burdt P; Green-McKenzie J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 28(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17265397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retractable winged steel (butterfly) needle performance improvement project.
    Hotaling M
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2009 Feb; 35(2):100-5, 61. PubMed ID: 19241730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comprehensive approach to percutaneous injury prevention during phlebotomy: results of a multicenter study, 1993-1995.
    Alvarado-Ramy F; Beltrami EM; Short LJ; Srivastava PU; Henry K; Mendelson M; Gerberding JL; Delclos GL; Campbell S; Solomon R; Fahrner R; Culver DH; Bell D; Cardo DM; Chamberland ME
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 12602691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.
    Lavoie MC; Verbeek JH; Pahwa M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD009740. PubMed ID: 24610008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
    Orenstein R; Reynolds L; Karabaic M; Lamb A; Markowitz SM; Wong ES
    Am J Infect Control; 1995 Dec; 23(6):344-51. PubMed ID: 8821109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers.
    Ippolito G; De Carli G; Puro V; Petrosillo N; Arici C; Bertucci R; Bianciardi L; Bonazzi L; Cestrone A; Daglio M
    JAMA; 1994 Aug 24-31; 272(8):607-10. PubMed ID: 8057516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cost of needle-stick injuries: the impact of safer medical devices.
    Armstrong SE
    Nurs Econ; 1991; 9(6):426-30, 433. PubMed ID: 1956430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sharps injuries among employees of acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, 2002-2007.
    Laramie AK; Pun VC; Fang SC; Kriebel D; Davis L
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 32(6):538-44. PubMed ID: 21558765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The efficacy of safety winged steel needles on needlestick injuries].
    Suzuki R; Kimura S; Shintani Y; Uchida M; Morisawa Y; Okuzumi K; Yoshida A; Suganoy Y; Moriya K; Koike K
    Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 2006 Jan; 80(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 16519123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of needle-protective devices to prevent sharps injuries.
    Trim JC
    Br J Nurs; 2004 Feb 12-25; 13(3):144, 146-53. PubMed ID: 14997076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Implementation of safety devices: biological accident prevention].
    Catalán Gómez MT; Sol Vidiella J; Castellà Castellà M; Castells Bo C; Losada Pla N; Espuny JL
    Rev Enferm; 2010 Apr; 33(4):50-4. PubMed ID: 20458895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing scalpel injuries in the operating room.
    Vose JG; McAdara-Berkowitz J
    AORN J; 2009 Dec; 90(6):867-72. PubMed ID: 19961972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Needlestick injuries in a major teaching hospital: the worthwhile effect of hospital-wide replacement of conventional hollow-bore needles.
    Whitby M; McLaws ML; Slater K
    Am J Infect Control; 2008 Apr; 36(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 18371513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.