BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17041244)

  • 1. Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 portable aerosol spectrometer to the TSI 3321 aerodynamic particle sizer for dry particles.
    Peters TM; Ott D; O'Shaughnessy PT
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Nov; 50(8):843-50. PubMed ID: 17041244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Workplace aerosol mass concentration measurement using optical particle counters.
    Görner P; Simon X; Bémer D; Lidén G
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Feb; 14(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 22009365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bioaerosol concentrator performance: comparative tests with viable and with solid and liquid nonviable particles.
    Kesavan J; Bottiger JR; McFarland AR
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 104(1):285-95. PubMed ID: 17922825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and evaluation of an inlet conditioner to dry particles for real-time particle sizers.
    Peters TM; Riss AL; Holm RL; Singh M; Vanderpool RW
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Apr; 10(4):541-51. PubMed ID: 18385876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a tractor cab using real-time aerosol counting instrumentation.
    Hall RM; Heitbrink WA; Reed LD
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Jan; 17(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11800406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the SidePak personal monitor with the Aerosol Particle Sizer (APS).
    Sánchez Jiménez A; van Tongeren M; Galea KS; Steinsvåg K; MacCalman L; Cherrie JW
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Jun; 13(6):1841-6. PubMed ID: 21528134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response characteristics of scattered light aerosol sensors used for control monitoring.
    Smith JP; Baron PA; Murdock DJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Mar; 48(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 3578033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the TSI Model 8520 and Grimm Series 1.108 portable aerosol instruments used to monitor particulate matter in an iron foundry.
    Cheng YH
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Mar; 5(3):157-68. PubMed ID: 18188737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurements of atmospheric aerosol size distributions by co-located optical particle counters.
    Tiwary A; Colls JJ
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Sep; 6(9):734-9. PubMed ID: 15346176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Passive aerosol sampler for particle concentrations and size distributions.
    Whitehead T; Leith D
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Mar; 10(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 18392275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of filter media for particle number, surface area and mass penetrations.
    Li L; Zuo Z; Japuntich DA; Pui DY
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):581-94. PubMed ID: 22752097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Size and concentration measurement of an industrial aerosol.
    O'Brien D; Baron P; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Jul; 47(7):386-92. PubMed ID: 3751888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined single-drop and rotating drum dustiness test of fine to nanosize powders using a small drum.
    Schneider T; Jensen KA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Jan; 52(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 18056087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of large aerosol particle size by elutriation.
    Tillery M; Buchan R
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):717-22. PubMed ID: 12363213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Light scattering characteristics of aerosols as a function of relative humidity: Part I--A comparison of measured scattering and aerosol concentrations using the theoretical models.
    Malm WC; Day DE; Kreidenweis SM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 May; 50(5):686-700. PubMed ID: 10842933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterisation of indoor airborne particles by using real-time aerosol mass spectrometry.
    Dall'Osto M; Harrison RM; Charpantidou E; Loupa G; Rapsomanikis S
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Oct; 384(1-3):120-33. PubMed ID: 17628640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A portable optical particle counter system for measuring dust aerosols.
    Marple VA; Rubow KL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Mar; 39(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 645547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance evaluation of newly developed portable aerosol sizers used for nanomaterial aerosol measurements.
    Yamada M; Takaya M; Ogura I
    Ind Health; 2015; 53(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 26320727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.