These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17041544)

  • 1. Effectiveness of a glutaraldehyde formulation in decontamination of dental unit water systems.
    Gigola P; Angelillo V; Garusi G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2006; 55(7-8):437-48. PubMed ID: 17041544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of an automated dental unit water system's contamination control protocol.
    Puttaiah R; Svoboda KK; Lin SM; Montebugnoli L; Dolci G; Spratt D; Siebert J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22430686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines: comparison between Er:YAG laser and turbine lines.
    Sacchetti R; Baldissarri A; De Luca G; Lucca P; Stampi S; Zanetti F
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 17196001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental unit waterlines: review and product evaluation.
    Panagakos FS; Lassiter T; Kumar E
    J N J Dent Assoc; 2001; 72(2):20-5, 38. PubMed ID: 11484611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failure of anti-retraction valves and the procedure for between patient flushing: a rationale for chemical control of dental unit waterline contamination.
    Montebugnoli L; Dolci G; Spratt DA; Puttaiah R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 16296436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental unit water: bacterial decontamination of old and new dental units by flushing water.
    Watanabe E; Agostinho AM; Matsumoto W; Ito I
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2008 Feb; 6(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 18205655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental unit waterline contamination--a review.
    Porteous N
    Tex Dent J; 2010 Jul; 127(7):677-85. PubMed ID: 20737988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of the efficacy of super-oxidised (Optident/Sterilox) water for the disinfection of dental unit water lines.
    Martin MV; Gallagher MA
    Br Dent J; 2005 Mar; 198(6):353-4; discussion 347. PubMed ID: 15789102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dental offices and environment quality].
    Galli MG; Tesauro M; Consonni M; Moscatelli D; Bianchi A
    Minerva Stomatol; 2004 May; 53(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 15263883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of delayed microbial analysis of dental unit water line specimens.
    Palenik CJ; Burgess KH; Miller CH
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 15973824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Hygiene problems in dental practice with special attention to dental units].
    Borneff M
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1986 Dec; 183(2-3):130-52. PubMed ID: 3107265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Decontamination of dental unit waterlines using disinfectants and filters].
    Monarca S; Garusi G; Gigola P; Spampinato L; Zani C; Sapelli PL
    Minerva Stomatol; 2002 Oct; 51(10):451-9. PubMed ID: 12548184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the dental unit waterline systems of teaching clinics.
    Al-Hiyasat AS; Ma'ayeh SY; Hindiyeh MY; Khader YS
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2007 Feb; 5(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 17250577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A centralised, automated dental hospital water quality and biofilm management system using neutral Ecasol maintains dental unit waterline output at better than potable quality: a 2-year longitudinal study.
    O'Donnell MJ; Boyle M; Swan J; Russell RJ; Coleman DC
    J Dent; 2009 Oct; 37(10):748-62. PubMed ID: 19573971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro modeling of dental water line contamination and decontamination.
    Spratt DA; Latif J; Montebugnoli LL; Wilson M
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2004 Jun; 235(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 15183886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a dental unit with a built-in decontamination system.
    Douglas CW; Rothwell PS
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):721-6. PubMed ID: 1946948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of distillation and line cleaning on the quality of water emitted from dental units.
    Palenik CJ; Miller CH
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):385-9. PubMed ID: 15002952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A pilot study of three methods for the reduction of bacterial contamination of dental unit water systems in routine use.
    Jatzwauk L; Reitemeier B
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Feb; 204(5-6):303-8. PubMed ID: 11885352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbiological evaluation of a newly designed dental air-turbine handpiece for anti-cross contaminations.
    Ohsuka S; Ohta M; Masuda K; Kaneda T; Ueda M
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 7916884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infection through sprays in medical devices for dentistry. A controllable epidemiological impact.
    Testarelli L; D'Aversa L; Dolci G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2004 Sep; 53(9):479-94. PubMed ID: 15499300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.