208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17041813)
1. Does composition medium affect the psychometric properties of scores on an exercise designed to assess written medical communication skills?
Boulet JR; McKinley DW; Rebbecchi T; Whelan GP
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2007 May; 12(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 17041813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating gender-related construct-irrelevant components of scores on the written assessment exercise of a high-stakes certification assessment.
Boulet JR; McKinley DW
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 15912284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the written communication skills of medical school graduates.
Boulet JR; Rebbecchi TA; Denton EC; McKinley DW; Whelan GP
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 14739761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the communication and interpersonal skills of graduates of international medical schools as part of the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 2 Clinical Skills (CS) Exam.
van Zanten M; Boulet JR; McKinley DW; DeChamplain A; Jobe AC
Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S65-8. PubMed ID: 17895694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LUCAS: a theoretically informed instrument to assess clinical communication in objective structured clinical examinations.
Huntley CD; Salmon P; Fisher PL; Fletcher I; Young B
Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 22324526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Undesired variance due to examiner stringency/leniency effect in communication skill scores assessed in OSCEs.
Harasym PH; Woloschuk W; Cunning L
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):617-32. PubMed ID: 17610034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-centered interviewing and student performance in a comprehensive clinical skills examination: is there an association?
Rouf E; Chumley H; Dobbie A
Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Apr; 75(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 19013743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing students' communication skills: validation of a global rating.
Scheffer S; Muehlinghaus I; Froehmel A; Ortwein H
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 17636371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Communication assessment using the common ground instrument: psychometric properties.
Lang F; McCord R; Harvill L; Anderson DS
Fam Med; 2004 Mar; 36(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 14999576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using standardized patients to assess the interpersonal skills of physicians: six years' experience with a high-stakes certification examination.
van Zanten M; Boulet JR; McKinley D
Health Commun; 2007; 22(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17967142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between candidate communication ability and oral certification examination scores.
Lunz ME; Bashook PG
Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 42(12):1227-33. PubMed ID: 19120954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The generalizability of documentation scores from the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills examination.
Clauser BE; Harik P; Margolis MJ; Mee J; Swygert K; Rebbecchi T
Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S41-4. PubMed ID: 18820498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gender differences in examinee performance on the Step 2 Clinical Skills data gathering (DG) and patient note (PN) components.
Swygert KA; Cuddy MM; van Zanten M; Haist SA; Jobe AC
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Oct; 17(4):557-71. PubMed ID: 22041870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rater errors in a clinical skills assessment of medical students.
Iramaneerat C; Yudkowsky R
Eval Health Prof; 2007 Sep; 30(3):266-83. PubMed ID: 17693619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of medical students' written expressions of emotion and coping and standardized patients' ratings of student professionalism and communication skills.
Shapiro J; Lie D
Med Teach; 2004 Dec; 26(8):733-5. PubMed ID: 15763880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning intimate examinations with simulated patients: the evaluation of medical students' performance.
Hendrickx K; De Winter B; Tjalma W; Avonts D; Peeraer G; Wyndaele JJ
Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):e139-47. PubMed ID: 19404886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast effects in the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills examination.
Ramineni C; Clauser BE; Harik P; Swanson DB
Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S45-8. PubMed ID: 18820499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychometric properties of an integrated assessment of technical and communication skills.
LeBlanc VR; Tabak D; Kneebone R; Nestel D; MacRae H; Moulton CA
Am J Surg; 2009 Jan; 197(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 19101250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing the utility of communication OSCEs: omit station-specific checklists and provide students with narrative feedback.
Van Nuland M; Van den Noortgate W; van der Vleuten C; Jo G
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jul; 88(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 22322068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing medical student competency in communication in the pre-clinical phase: objective structured video exam and SP exam.
Karabilgin OS; Vatansever K; Caliskan SA; Durak Hİ
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jun; 87(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 22169634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
