129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17041948)
1. Improvement of diagnostic accuracy and screening conditions with liquid-based cytology.
Schledermann D; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Nov; 34(11):780-5. PubMed ID: 17041948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significance of atypia in conventional Papanicolaou smears and liquid-based cytology: a follow-up study.
Schledermann D; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
Cytopathology; 2004 Jun; 15(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 15165271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and fluid-based, thin-layer cytology with colposcopic biopsy control in central Italy: a consecutive sampling study of 461 cases.
Rahimi S; Carnovale-Scalzo C; Marani C; Renzi C; Malvasi A; Votano S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jan; 37(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18973131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Two cytological methods for screening for cervical cancer].
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 May; 170(22):1933-7. PubMed ID: 18513478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An audit of liquid-based cervical cytology screening samples (ThinPrep and SurePath) reported as glandular neoplasia.
Thiryayi SA; Marshall J; Rana DN
Cytopathology; 2010 Aug; 21(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 19843139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer.
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):187-94. PubMed ID: 16879266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
Hølund B; Grinsted P
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Follow-up of non-negative cervical cytological smears in the county of Funen].
Dahl MB; Hølund B; Sørensen B; Ahrons S; Grinsted P; Poulsen EF
Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5798-801. PubMed ID: 9782760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Applicative aspects of liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening].
Liverani M; De Paola F; Danesi S; Fedriga R; Dalbuoni V; Agnoletti R; Amadori AR; Mirra F; Bonoli W; Saragoni L
Pathologica; 2006 Dec; 98(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 17285839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Causes and relevance of unsatisfactory and satisfactory but limited smears of liquid-based compared with conventional cervical cytology.
Siebers AG; Klinkhamer PJ; Vedder JE; Arbyn M; Bulten J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jan; 136(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 22208490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endometrial carcinoma detected with SurePath liquid-based cervical cytology: comparison with conventional cytology.
Patel C; Ullal A; Roberts M; Brady J; Birch P; Bulmer JN; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):380-7. PubMed ID: 19207308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Re: Liquid-based cytology for cervical screening.
Blamey S; Jackson T; Robinson J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Feb; 46(1):70-1; author reply 71-2. PubMed ID: 16441706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of liquid-based preparation in urine cytology.
Hwang EC; Park SH; Jung SI; Kwon DD; Park K; Ryu SB; Park CS
Int J Urol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):626-9. PubMed ID: 17645607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of liquid-based oral cytology on the diagnosis of oral squamous dysplasia and carcinoma.
Navone R; Burlo P; Pich A; Pentenero M; Broccoletti R; Marsico A; Gandolfo S
Cytopathology; 2007 Dec; 18(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 18031448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of monolayer specimens and conventional smears].
Jensen ML; Fuursted PB; Svanholm H
Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Feb; 163(9):1270-5. PubMed ID: 11258251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of a low priced liquid-based method for cervical cytology in 632 women referred for colposcopy after a positive Pap smear.
van Hemel BM; Buikema HJ; Groen H; Suurmeijer AJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Aug; 37(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 19373881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods.
Williams AR
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 16548992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid pre-screening is more sensitive in liquid-based cytology than in conventional smears.
Dudding N; Renshaw AA; Ellis K
Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 21135523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
