77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17043070)
1. The effectiveness of a high output/short duration radiofrequency current application technique in segmental pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation.
Nilsson B; Chen X; Pehrson S; Svendsen JH
Europace; 2006 Nov; 8(11):962-5. PubMed ID: 17043070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicenter prospective comparison of conventional and high-power short duration radiofrequency application for pulmonary vein isolation: the high-power short-duration radiofrequency application for faster and safer pulmonary vein ablation (POWER FAST III) trial.
Castrejón-Castrejón S; Martínez Cossiani M; Jáuregui-Abularach M; Basterra Sola N; Ibáñez Criado JL; Osca Asensi J; Roca Luque I; Moya Mitjans A; Quesada Dorador A; Hidalgo Olivares VM; Pérez Castellano N; Fernández Gómez JM; Macías-Ruiz MR; Bochard Villanueva B; Gonzalo Bada N; Fernández Prieto A; Guido López LE; Martínez Maldonado ME; Merino D; Escobar Cervantes C; Merino JL;
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2023 Nov; 66(8):1889-1899. PubMed ID: 36807734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selecting High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation: How High Is High?
Lee AC
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Dec; 9(12):2584-2586. PubMed ID: 37855772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Very high-power and short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in a Latin American low-volume private center.
Keegan R; Garmendia F; Gregorietti F; Urruti R; Onetto L
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38261105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the 'CLOSE'-protocol.
Phlips T; Taghji P; El Haddad M; Wolf M; Knecht S; Vandekerckhove Y; Tavernier R; Duytschaever M
Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f419-f427. PubMed ID: 29315411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-Power and Short-Duration Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Biophysical Characterization.
Leshem E; Zilberman I; Tschabrunn CM; Barkagan M; Contreras-Valdes FM; Govari A; Anter E
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2018 Apr; 4(4):467-479. PubMed ID: 30067486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Very High Power, Short Duration, Temperature-Controlled Lesions: The QDOT-FAST Trial.
Reddy VY; Grimaldi M; De Potter T; Vijgen JM; Bulava A; Duytschaever MF; Martinek M; Natale A; Knecht S; Neuzil P; Pürerfellner H
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2019 Jul; 5(7):778-786. PubMed ID: 31320006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of high-power short-duration and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for treating atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen CF; Wu J; Jin CL; Liu MJ; Xu YZ
Clin Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 43(12):1631-1640. PubMed ID: 33107625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and outcome of very high-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Kottmaier M; Popa M; Bourier F; Reents T; Cifuentes J; Semmler V; Telishevska M; Otgonbayar U; Koch-Büttner K; Lennerz C; Bartkowiak M; Kornmayer M; Rousseva E; Brkic A; Grebmer C; Kolb C; Hessling G; Deisenhofer I
Europace; 2020 Mar; 22(3):388-393. PubMed ID: 31872249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-power application is associated with shorter procedure time and higher rate of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation in ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation.
Okamatsu H; Koyama J; Sakai Y; Negishi K; Hayashi K; Tsurugi T; Tanaka Y; Nakao K; Sakamoto T; Okumura K
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2751-2758. PubMed ID: 31600006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low complication rates using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations.
Winkle RA; Mohanty S; Patrawala RA; Mead RH; Kong MH; Engel G; Salcedo J; Trivedi CG; Gianni C; Jais P; Natale A; Day JD
Heart Rhythm; 2019 Feb; 16(2):165-169. PubMed ID: 30712645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation on Long-Term Lesion Durability for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.
Yavin HD; Leshem E; Shapira-Daniels A; Sroubek J; Barkagan M; Haffajee CI; Cooper JM; Anter E
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Aug; 6(8):973-985. PubMed ID: 32819533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation using a contact force-sensing catheter and conventional technique: Initial results.
Vassallo F; Cunha C; Serpa E; Meigre LL; Carloni H; Simoes A; Hespanhol D; Lovatto CV; Batista W; Serpa R
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1877-1883. PubMed ID: 31397522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-power short duration and low-power long duration in atrial fibrillation ablation: A meta-analysis.
Kewcharoen J; Techorueangwiwat C; Kanitsoraphan C; Leesutipornchai T; Akoum N; Bunch TJ; Navaravong L
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Jan; 32(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 33155303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Update on high-power short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation.
Qiu J; Wang Y; Wang DW; Hu M; Chen G
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Sep; 31(9):2499-2508. PubMed ID: 32621311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using ablation index-guided high power (50 W) for pulmonary vein isolation with or without esophageal temperature probe (the AI-HP ESO II).
Chen S; Schmidt B; Seeger A; Bordignon S; Tohoku S; Willems F; Urbanek L; Throm C; Konstantinou A; Plank K; Hilbert M; Zanchi S; Bianchini L; Bologna F; Tsianakas N; Kreuzer C; Chun KRJ
Heart Rhythm; 2020 Nov; 17(11):1833-1840. PubMed ID: 32470628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of high-power and conventional-power radiofrequency energy deliveries in pulmonary vein isolation using unipolar signal modification as a local endpoint.
Ejima K; Higuchi S; Yazaki K; Kataoka S; Yagishita D; Kanai M; Shoda M; Hagiwara N
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jul; 31(7):1702-1708. PubMed ID: 32378266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impedance drop predicts acute electrical reconnection of the pulmonary vein-left atrium after pulmonary vein isolation using short-duration high-power exposure.
Yazaki K; Ejima K; Kanai M; Kataoka S; Higuchi S; Yagishita D; Shoda M; Hagiwara N
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2020 Dec; 59(3):575-584. PubMed ID: 31902084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pulmonary vein isolation using a higher power shorter duration CLOSE protocol with a surround flow ablation catheter.
Berte B; Hilfiker G; Russi I; Moccetti F; Cuculi F; Toggweiler S; Ruschitzka F; Kobza R
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Nov; 30(11):2199-2204. PubMed ID: 31424123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcomes after low power, slower movement versus high power, faster movement irrigated-tip catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Bunch TJ; May HT; Bair TL; Crandall BG; Cutler MJ; Mallender C; Weiss JP; Osborn JS; Day JD
Heart Rhythm; 2020 Feb; 17(2):184-189. PubMed ID: 31398477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
