These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17043554)

  • 1. Endocervical sampling: a comparison of endocervical brush, endocervical curette, and combined brush with curette techniques.
    Gibson CA; Trask CE; House P; Smith SF; Foley M; Nicholas C
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2001 Jan; 5(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17043554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endocervical sampling using brush versus curette: a single centre experience and literature review.
    Mitric C; Lakabi R; Kligun G; Matanes E; Lau S; Gotlieb WH; Salvador S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 43(1):2162866. PubMed ID: 36689210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized trial of the sleeved cytobrush and the endocervical curette.
    Boardman LA; Meinz H; Steinhoff MM; Heber WW; Blume J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 12636943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of the endocervical brush after endocervical curettage.
    Tate KM; Strickland JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):715-7. PubMed ID: 9351750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of endocervical curettage and endocervical brushing.
    Klam S; Arseneau J; Mansour N; Franco E; Ferenczy A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jul; 96(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 10862849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
    Martin D; Umpierre SA; Villamarzo G; Sánchez O; Sánchez J; Carrodeguas J; Adamsons K
    P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. User perception of endocervical sampling: A randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush.
    Undurraga M; Catarino R; Navarria I; Ibrahim Y; Puget E; Royannez Drevard I; Pache JC; Tille JC; Petignat P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0186812. PubMed ID: 29107949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cone biopsy: has endocervical sampling a role?
    Anderson DJ; Strachan F; Parkin DE
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Aug; 99(8):668-70. PubMed ID: 1390473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
    Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cytologic distinctions between clinical groups using curette-probe compared to cytology brush.
    Lin RY; Nahal A; Lee M; Menikoff H
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2001 Feb; 86(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 11258695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved endocervical sampling and HPV viral load detection by Cervex-Brush Combi.
    Depuydt CE; Benoy IH; Bailleul EJ; Vandepitte J; Vereecken AJ; Bogers JJ
    Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 17168921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artifactual endocervical atypia induced by endocervical brush collection.
    Fiorella RM; Casafrancisco D; Yokota S; Kragel PJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(1):79-83; discussion 83-4. PubMed ID: 7956667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High concordance of results of testing for human papillomavirus in cervicovaginal samples collected by two methods, with comparison of a novel self-sampling device to a conventional endocervical brush.
    Brink AA; Meijer CJ; Wiegerinck MA; Nieboer TE; Kruitwagen RF; van Kemenade F; Fransen Daalmeijer N; Hesselink AT; Berkhof J; Snijders PJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 44(7):2518-23. PubMed ID: 16825374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing endocervical curettage and endocervical brush at colposcopy.
    Dunn TS; Stevens-Simon C; Moeller LD; Miekle S
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2000 Apr; 4(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 25950892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endocervical sampling by Kevorkian curette or Pipelle aspiration device: a randomized comparison.
    Oliveira MM; Farias-Eisner RP; Pitkin RM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1889-92; discussion 1892-4. PubMed ID: 7778649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
    Lo L; Jordan J
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lack of Agreement Between Endocervical Brush and Endocervical Curettage in Women Undergoing Repeat Endocervical Sampling.
    Doo DW; Stickrath EH; Mazzoni SE; Alston MJ
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Oct; 20(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 27518843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Cervex-Brush® Combi and the Cytobrush+Ayres Spatula Combination for Cervical Sampling in Liquid-Based Cytology.
    Simonsen M; Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani JH; Possati Resende JC; Antoniazzi M; Longatto-Filho A; Scapulatempo-Neto C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164077. PubMed ID: 27741238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endocervical glandular atypia: does a preneoplastic lesion of adenocarcinoma in situ exist?
    Goldstein NS; Ahmad E; Hussain M; Hankin RC; Perez-Reyes N
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Aug; 110(2):200-9. PubMed ID: 9704619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.