These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17043915)

  • 1. Is an Angoff standard an indication of minimal competence of examinees or of judges?
    Verheggen MM; Muijtjens AM; Van Os J; Schuwirth LW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 17043915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Setting standards for performance tests: a pilot study of a three-level Angoff method.
    Yudkowsky R; Downing SM; Popescu M
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S13-6. PubMed ID: 18820491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do baseline data influence standard setting for a clinical skills examination?
    Wayne DB; Barsuk JH; Cohen E; McGaghie WC
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S105-8. PubMed ID: 17895672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of judge selection on standard setting for a patient survey of physician communication skills.
    Wayne DB; Cohen E; Makoul G; McGaghie WC
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S17-20. PubMed ID: 18820492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.
    Bandaranayake RC
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(9-10):836-45. PubMed ID: 19117221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standard setting with dichotomous and constructed response items: some Rasch model approaches.
    MacCann RG
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):438-54. PubMed ID: 19934530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Convergence between cluster analysis and the Angoff method for setting minimum passing scores on credentialing examinations.
    Hess B; Subhiyah RG; Giordano C
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Dec; 30(4):362-75. PubMed ID: 17986670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Setting defensible standards for cardiac auscultation skills in medical students.
    Wayne DB; Butter J; Cohen ER; McGaghie WC
    Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10 Suppl):S94-6. PubMed ID: 19907398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Insights into the Angoff method: results from a simulation study.
    Shulruf B; Wilkinson T; Weller J; Jones P; Poole P
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 May; 16():134. PubMed ID: 27142788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Trainee Performance Data on Standard-Setting Judgments Using the Mastery Angoff Method.
    Prenner SB; McGaghie WC; Chuzi S; Cantey E; Didwania A; Barsuk JH
    J Grad Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 10(3):301-305. PubMed ID: 29946387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and credibility of an angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing using recent graduates as judges.
    Verhoeven BH; van der Steeg AF; Scherpbier AJ; Muijtjens AM; Verwijnen GM; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 1999 Nov; 33(11):832-7. PubMed ID: 10583792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panel expertise for an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing: item writers compared to recently graduated students.
    Verhoeven BH; Verwijnen GM; Muijtjens AM; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2002 Sep; 36(9):860-7. PubMed ID: 12354249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the minimum number of judges required for test-centred standard setting on written assessments. do discussion and iteration have an influence?
    Fowell SL; Fewtrell R; McLaughlin PJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 16957872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to set the bar in competency-based medical education: standard setting after an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).
    Dwyer T; Wright S; Kulasegaram KM; Theodoropoulos J; Chahal J; Wasserstein D; Ringsted C; Hodges B; Ogilvie-Harris D
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jan; 16():1. PubMed ID: 26727954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Undesired variance due to examiner stringency/leniency effect in communication skill scores assessed in OSCEs.
    Harasym PH; Woloschuk W; Cunning L
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):617-32. PubMed ID: 17610034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judges' perception of candidates' organization and communication, in relation to oral certification examination ratings.
    Houston JE; Myford CM
    Acad Med; 2009 Nov; 84(11):1603-9. PubMed ID: 19858824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A model for setting performance standards for standardized patient examinations.
    Talente G; Haist SA; Wilson JF
    Eval Health Prof; 2003 Dec; 26(4):427-46. PubMed ID: 14631613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Procedures for establishing defensible absolute passing scores on performance examinations in health professions education.
    Downing SM; Tekian A; Yudkowsky R
    Teach Learn Med; 2006; 18(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 16354141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishing pass/fail criteria for bronchoscopy performance.
    Konge L; Clementsen P; Larsen KR; Arendrup H; Buchwald C; Ringsted C
    Respiration; 2012; 83(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 21986097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.