131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17044402)
1. Parameter estimation in stochastic mammogram model by heuristic optimization techniques.
Selvan SE; Xavier CC; Karssemeijer N; Sequeira J; Cherian RA; Dhala BY
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2006 Oct; 10(4):685-95. PubMed ID: 17044402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.
Lu LJ; Nishino TK; Khamapirad T; Grady JJ; Leonard MH; Brunder DG
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4905-21. PubMed ID: 17671343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
Kus P; Karagoz I
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technique for preprocessing of digital mammogram.
Maitra IK; Nag S; Bandyopadhyay SK
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Aug; 107(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 21669471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linearization of mammograms using parameters derived from noise characteristics.
Karssemeijer N; Snoeren PR; Zhang W
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2005; 19():258-69. PubMed ID: 17354701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform.
Eltoukhy MM; Faye I; Samir BB
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 20004076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new validation method for X-ray mammogram registration algorithms using a projection model of breast X-ray compression.
Hipwell JH; Tanner C; Crum WR; Schnabel JA; Hawkes DJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1190-200. PubMed ID: 17896592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Reljin B; Milosević Z; Stojić T; Reljin I
Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2009 Jan; 47(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 20164042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
Singh S; Bovis K
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms.
Zhou C; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):1056-69. PubMed ID: 11439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammography segmentation with maximum likelihood active contours.
Rahmati P; Adler A; Hamarneh G
Med Image Anal; 2012 Aug; 16(6):1167-86. PubMed ID: 22831774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.
Vikhe PS; Thool VR
J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
Sheybani EO; Sankar R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
