These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17044739)
21. [Relative numerousness judgements in crows and pigeons in the urgent comparison of stimuli earlier linked to different amounts of reinforcement]. Zorin ZA; Kalinina TS; Maĭorova ME; Mikitich IuB; Khurtina AV Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1991; 41(2):306-13. PubMed ID: 1651621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. When is a choice not a choice? Pigeons fail to inhibit incorrect responses on a go/no-go midsession reversal task. McMillan N; Sturdy CB; Spetch ML J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 25915749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of intruded events on peak time: the role of reinforcement history during the intruded event. Aum S; Brown BL; Hemmes NS Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 17157998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Learning processes in matching and oddity: the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement. Wright AA; Delius JD J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 16248729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Differential resurgence and response elimination. Doughty AH; da Silva SP; Lattal KA Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 17395402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Oddity learning in the pigeon as a function of the number of incorrect alternatives. Zentall TR; Hogan DE; Edwards CA; Hearst E J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Jul; 6(3):278-99. PubMed ID: 7391753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Divided stimulus control: Which key did you peck, or what color was it? Davison M J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):107-124. PubMed ID: 29194638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Post-choice information processing by pigeons. Martin TI; Zentall TR Anim Cogn; 2005 Oct; 8(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 15744507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. On some determinants of choice in pigeons. REYNOLDS GS J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Jan; 6(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 13986426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Short-term remembering of discriminative stimuli in pigeons. Jans JE; Catania AC J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Sep; 34(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 7411014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rats are optimal in a choice task in which pigeons are not. Trujano RE; Orduña V Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():22-7. PubMed ID: 26200394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Value transfer across odor stimuli using probability of reinforcement in the rat. Kaiser DH; Means L Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 16781086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies. Smith AP; Bailey AR; Chow JJ; Beckmann JS; Zentall TR PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159336. PubMed ID: 27441394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Further tests of the Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET) and the Learning-to-Time (LeT) model in a temporal bisection task. Machado A; Arantes J Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 16616993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Delayed signal detection, differential reinforcement, and short-term memory in the pigeon. Harnett P; McCarthy D; Davison M J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jul; 42(1):87-111. PubMed ID: 6481301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Molar function depends on molecular structure of behavior. Shimp CP; Fremouw T; Ingebritsen LM; Long KA J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Jan; 20(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 8308495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Matching and oddity relational learning by pigeons (Columba livia): transfer from color to shape. Lombardi CM Anim Cogn; 2008 Jan; 11(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 17516101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Localized lesions of arcopallium intermedium of the lateral forebrain caused a handling-cost aversion in the domestic chick performing a binary choice task. Aoki N; Csillag A; Matsushima T Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 24(8):2314-26. PubMed ID: 17074052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reaction times identify a Pavlovian component in a two-choice discrimination. Blough DS Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 19429212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition. Kyonka EG Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]