These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17044741)
21. From contrast to reinforcement: role of response contingency in anticipatory contrast. Flaherty CF; Grigson PS J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Apr; 14(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 3367102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Muscarinic receptor antagonism of the nucleus accumbens core causes avoidance to flavor and spatial cues. Pratt WE; Spencer RC; Kelley AE Behav Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 121(6):1215-23. PubMed ID: 18085875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Flavor preferences conditioned by high-fat versus high-carbohydrate diets vary as a function of session length. Lucas F; Sclafani A Physiol Behav; 1999 May; 66(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 10357427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Conditioned flavor preference learning by intragastric administration of L-glutamate in rats. Uematsu A; Tsurugizawa T; Kondoh T; Torii K Neurosci Lett; 2009 Feb; 451(3):190-3. PubMed ID: 19146916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The extinction procedure modifies a conditioned flavor preference in nonhungry rats only after revaluation of the unconditioned stimulus. González F; Morillas E; Hall G J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 27732050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Food color, flavor, and conditioned avoidance among red-winged blackbirds. Werner SJ; Kimball BA; Provenza FD Physiol Behav; 2008 Jan; 93(1-2):110-7. PubMed ID: 17804026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reinforcing and aversive effects of caffeine measured by flavor preference conditioning in caffeine-naive and caffeine-acclimated rats. Myers KP; Izbicki EV Physiol Behav; 2006 Jul; 88(4-5):585-96. PubMed ID: 16806323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Stimulus modality effects on transformations of conditioned enhancement and conditioned suppression in rats. Walasek G; Zieliński K Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1989; 49(5):215-38. PubMed ID: 2589109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The contribution of latent inhibition to reduced generalization after pre-exposure to the test stimulus. Sanjuan Mdel C; Alonso G; Nelson JB Behav Processes; 2006 Jan; 71(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 16242859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analysis of blocking of flavor-preference conditioning based on nutrients and palatable tastes in rats. González F; Garcia-Burgos D; Hall G Appetite; 2014 Sep; 80():161-7. PubMed ID: 24845784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The neurotensin receptor agonist NT69L suppresses sucrose-reinforced operant behavior in the rat. Boules M; Iversen I; Oliveros A; Shaw A; Williams K; Robinson J; Fredrickson P; Richelson E Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1127(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 17113052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. US-preexposure effects in flavor-preference and flavor-aversion learning with nonnutritive USs. Gil M; Recio SA; de Brugada I; Symonds M; Hall G Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():67-73. PubMed ID: 24811451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Resistance to extinction in the steady state and in transition. Nevin JA; Grace RC J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Apr; 31(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 15839776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]