These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17045148)

  • 21. Is the Royal London Space Analysis reliable and does it influence orthodontic treatment decisions?
    Al-Abdallah M; Sandler J; O'Brien K
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):503-7. PubMed ID: 18632842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliabilities of 3-dimensional orthodontic digital setups.
    Fabels LN; Nijkamp PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 25432262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study.
    Asquith J; Gillgrass T; Mossey P
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17974542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Role of lateral cephalograms in assessing severity and difficulty of orthodontic cases.
    Pae EK; McKenna GA; Sheehan TJ; Garcia R; Kuhlberg A; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Sep; 120(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 11552124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An extraction dilemma: Cheryl's case.
    Kerr WJ; Clark JD; Davis MH
    Dent Update; 1997 Dec; 24(10):424-7. PubMed ID: 9534419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.
    Soh J; Sandham A; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16286213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
    Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontic patients with 3-dimensional dentofacial records.
    Manosudprasit A; Haghi A; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1083-1091. PubMed ID: 28554454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.
    Okunami TR; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Evans CA; Sadowsky C; Fadavi S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17208106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An alternative to study model storage.
    Malik OH; Abdi-Oskouei M; Mandall NA
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 19028672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.
    Hildebrand JC; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Sivik M; Hans M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 18249296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Traditional plaster casts and dental digital models: intra-examiner reliability of measurements.
    Mangiacapra R; Butti AC; Salvato A; Biagi R
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 20545091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A study model based photographic method for assessment of surgical treatment outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.
    Ali SA; Mossey P; Gillgrass T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 16772319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.
    Janson G; Barros SE; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 17920502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment in children. A retrospective study.
    Järvinen S; Widström E; Raitio M
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15272514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning?
    Devereux L; Moles D; Cunningham SJ; McKnight M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e175-81. PubMed ID: 21300228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.