These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. "Pacecare"--a computerized database for pacemaker follow-up. Strathmore N; Mond H; Hunt D; Graham D; Cowling R; Hale G; Pate B Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1787-91. PubMed ID: 1704542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of myopotential interference in unipolar-bipolar programmable DDD pacemakers. Gabry MD; Behrens M; Andrews C; Wanliss M; Klementowicz PT; Furman S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Nov; 10(6):1322-30. PubMed ID: 2446279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A computerized system for modeling pacemaker rhythms. Byrd CB; Byrd CL J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct; 20 Suppl():28-33. PubMed ID: 3694100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of paced electrocardiograms by inverse computer modeling of pacemaker actions. Malik M; Camm AJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):2093-100. PubMed ID: 2463594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized interpretation of the paced ECG. Greenhut SE; Jenkins JM; DiCarlo LA J Electrocardiol; 1992; 24 Suppl():146-52. PubMed ID: 1552248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Pifalls in the interpretation of pacemaker ECGs]. Israel CW; Tribunyan S; Kalyani M Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2020 Dec; 31(4):345-361. PubMed ID: 33079275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new system for follow-up patients with permanent pacemakers. Broffoni T; Bonini W; Ferrari G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1782-6. PubMed ID: 1704541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Which programmable functions of pacemakers are available, and what is their clinical relevance?]. Jung W; Manz M; Lüderitz B Herz; 1991 Jun; 16(3):158-70. PubMed ID: 1889791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A low-pass filter of 300 Hz improved the detection of pacemaker spike on remote and bedside electrocardiogram. Sun J; Lu QF; Zhao Y; Zhang PP; Wang J; Wang QS; Liu XH; Li YG Chin Med J (Engl); 2019 Mar; 132(5):534-541. PubMed ID: 30807352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Giant pacemaker spikes. An electrocardiographic artifact. Peters RW; Kushner M; Knapp K Chest; 1985 Feb; 87(2):256-7. PubMed ID: 3967532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The pacemaker inverse problem--computer diagnosis of paced electrocardiograms. Malik M; Camm AJ Comput Biomed Res; 1988 Jun; 21(3):289-306. PubMed ID: 3383558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Body surface isopotential mapping of permanent cardiac pacemaker spike amplitudes: a noninvasive method for detecting and localizing insulation failure. Rosengarten M; Funnell WR Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Jul; 11(7):1063-9. PubMed ID: 2457885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Common pitfalls in interpreting pacemaker electrocardiograms in the emergency department. Venkatachalam KL J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(6):616-21. PubMed ID: 21907995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence and predictors of pacemaker dysfunction with unipolar ventricular lead configuration. Can we identify patients who benefit from bipolar electrodes? Wiegand UK; Bode F; Bonnemeier H; Tölg R; Peters W; Katus HA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Sep; 24(9 Pt 1):1383-8. PubMed ID: 11584461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new pacemaker algorithm for continuous capture verification and automatic threshold determination: elimination of pacemaker afterpotential utilizing a triphasic charge balancing system. Feld GK; Love CJ; Camerlo J; Marsella R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Feb; 15(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 1372416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]