147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1704547)
1. Intrapatient comparison between chronic VVIR and DDD pacing in patients affected by high degree AV block without heart failure.
Menozzi C; Brignole M; Moracchini PV; Lolli G; Bacchi M; Tesorieri MC; Tosoni GD; Bollini R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1816-22. PubMed ID: 1704547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block.
Oldroyd KG; Rae AP; Carter R; Wingate C; Cobbe SM
Br Heart J; 1991 Apr; 65(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 1827588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
Sulke N; Chambers J; Dritsas A; Sowton E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block.
Hargreaves MR; Channon KM; Cripps TR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ
Br Heart J; 1995 Oct; 74(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 7488454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers.
Lau CP; Wong CK; Leung WH; Liu WX
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. PubMed ID: 1704550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality-of-life during DDD and dual sensor VVIR pacing.
Lukl J; Doupal V; Heinc P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Nov; 17(11 Pt 2):1844-8. PubMed ID: 7845778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DDD versus VVIR versus VVI mode in patients with indication to dual-chamber stimulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study.
Moro E; Caprioglio F; Berton G; Marcon C; Riva U; Corbucci G; Delise P
Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 16212074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized, single-blind crossover comparison of the effects of chronic DDD and dual sensor VVIR pacing mode on quality-of-life and cardiopulmonary performance in complete heart block.
Deharo JC; Badier M; Thirion X; Ritter P; Provenier F; Graux P; Guillot C; Mugica J; Jordaens L; Djiane P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Sep; 19(9):1320-6. PubMed ID: 8880795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Importance of AV synchronous pacing during low intensity exercise evaluated by oxygen kinetics.
Rickli H; Brunner-La Rocca HP; Maccarter DJ; Duru F; Candinas R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Feb; 23(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 10709225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of AV synchronization and rate increase on hemodynamics and on atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with total AV block].
Lemke B; Gude J; von Dryander S; Barmeyer J; Braun BE; Krieg M
Z Kardiol; 1990 Aug; 79(8):547-56. PubMed ID: 2145704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual sensor VVIR mode pacing: is it worth it?
Sulke N; Tan K; Kamalvand K; Bostock J; Bucknall C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 1):1560-7. PubMed ID: 8946451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DDD versus VVIR pacing in patients, ages 70 and over, with complete heart block.
Ouali S; Neffeti E; Ghoul K; Hammas S; Kacem S; Gribaa R; Remedi F; Boughzela E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 May; 33(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 20015129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality-of-life in DDDR pacing: atrioventricular synchrony or rate adaptation?
Lau CP; Tai YT; Lee PW; Cheung B; Tang MO; Lam WK
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Nov; 17(11 Pt 2):1838-43. PubMed ID: 7845777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of low rate dual chamber pacing to activity responsive rate variable ventricular pacing.
Batey RL; Sweesy MW; Scala G; Forney RC
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 May; 13(5):646-52. PubMed ID: 1693204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical work capacity with rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVIR) versus dual chamber pacing (DDD) in patients with normal and diminished left ventricular function.
Frielingsdorf J; Dür P; Gerber AE; Vuilliomenet A; Bertel O
Int J Cardiol; 1995 May; 49(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 7649670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DDD(R) pacing with automatic mode switch in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation following AV nodal ablation.
Schuchert A; van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
Cardiology; 1997; 88(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 9197425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total sympathetic activity and atrial natriuretic factor levels in VVI and DDD pacing with different atrioventricular delays during daily activity and exercise.
Theodorakis GN; Kremastinos DT; Markianos M; Livanis E; Karavolias G; Toutouzas PK
Eur Heart J; 1992 Nov; 13(11):1477-81. PubMed ID: 1334465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with complete AV block.
Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Mizumaki K; Sasayama S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1482-91. PubMed ID: 1383960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
