609 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1704550)
1. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers.
Lau CP; Wong CK; Leung WH; Liu WX
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. PubMed ID: 1704550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
Sulke N; Chambers J; Dritsas A; Sowton E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of heart rate response during exercise in patients using atrioventricular synchronous and ventricular pacemakers.
McMeekin JD; Lautner D; Hanson S; Gulamhusein SS
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 1689036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of rate modulated dual chamber and VVIR pacing.
Jutzy RV; Florio J; Isaeff DM; Marsa RJ; Bansal RC; Jutzy KR; Levine PA; Feenstra L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1838-46. PubMed ID: 1704551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Importance of AV synchronous pacing during low intensity exercise evaluated by oxygen kinetics.
Rickli H; Brunner-La Rocca HP; Maccarter DJ; Duru F; Candinas R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Feb; 23(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 10709225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality-of-life in DDDR pacing: atrioventricular synchrony or rate adaptation?
Lau CP; Tai YT; Lee PW; Cheung B; Tang MO; Lam WK
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Nov; 17(11 Pt 2):1838-43. PubMed ID: 7845777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays.
Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atrial arrhythmia management with sensor controlled atrial refractory period and automatic mode switching in patients with minute ventilation sensing dual chamber rate adaptive pacemakers.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Fong PC; Li JP; Chung FL
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1504-14. PubMed ID: 1383962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lack of influence of atrioventricular delay on stroke volume at rest in patients with complete atrioventricular block and dual chamber pacing.
Occhetta E; Piccinino C; Francalacci G; Magnani A; Bolognese L; Devecchi P; Rognoni G; Rossi P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jul; 13(7):916-26. PubMed ID: 1695749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the hemodynamic benefits of rate adaptive AV delay during exercise in paced patients with complete heart block.
Sheppard RC; Ren JF; Ross J; McAllister M; Chandrasekaran K; Kutalek SP
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Nov; 16(11):2157-67. PubMed ID: 7505929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Haemodynamic advantage with single chamber rate responsive pacemakers over dual chamber pacemakers during exercise in chronotropic incompetence.
Maity AK; Ghosh SP; Dasbiswas A; Chatterjee SS; Chaudhury D; Das MK
Indian Heart J; 1992; 44(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 1289220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with complete AV block.
Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Mizumaki K; Sasayama S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1482-91. PubMed ID: 1383960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is accurate rate response programming necessary?
Sulke N; Dritsas A; Chambers J; Sowton E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Aug; 13(8):1031-44. PubMed ID: 1697950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrapatient comparison between chronic VVIR and DDD pacing in patients affected by high degree AV block without heart failure.
Menozzi C; Brignole M; Moracchini PV; Lolli G; Bacchi M; Tesorieri MC; Tosoni GD; Bollini R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1816-22. PubMed ID: 1704547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal atrioventricular delay at rest and during exercise in patients with dual chamber pacemakers: a non-invasive assessment by continuous wave Doppler.
Mehta D; Gilmour S; Ward DE; Camm AJ
Br Heart J; 1989 Feb; 61(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 2923753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative importance of activation sequence compared to atrioventricular synchrony in left ventricular function.
Rosenqvist M; Isaaz K; Botvinick EH; Dae MW; Cockrell J; Abbott JA; Schiller NB; Griffin JC
Am J Cardiol; 1991 Jan; 67(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 1987716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiac output is a sensitive indicator of difference in exercise performance between single and dual sensor pacemakers.
Leung SK; Lau CP; Tang MO
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 1):35-41. PubMed ID: 9474646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
