181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1704551)
1. Comparative evaluation of rate modulated dual chamber and VVIR pacing.
Jutzy RV; Florio J; Isaeff DM; Marsa RJ; Bansal RC; Jutzy KR; Levine PA; Feenstra L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1838-46. PubMed ID: 1704551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
Sulke N; Chambers J; Dritsas A; Sowton E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of cardiac pacing modes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Jutzy RV; Houston-Feenstra L; Levine PA
Chest; 1994 Jan; 105(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 8275792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers.
Lau CP; Wong CK; Leung WH; Liu WX
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. PubMed ID: 1704550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aerobic capacity in rate modulated pacing.
Lemke B; Dryander SV; Jäger D; Machraoui A; MacCarter D; Barmeyer J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1914-8. PubMed ID: 1279571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ventricular function in atrial rate adaptive versus dual chamber rate adaptive pacing during exercise.
Gallik DM; Guidry GW; Mahmarian JJ; Verani MS; Spencer WH
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 7513403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL
Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Importance of AV synchronous pacing during low intensity exercise evaluated by oxygen kinetics.
Rickli H; Brunner-La Rocca HP; Maccarter DJ; Duru F; Candinas R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Feb; 23(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 10709225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with complete AV block.
Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Mizumaki K; Sasayama S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1482-91. PubMed ID: 1383960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality-of-life in DDDR pacing: atrioventricular synchrony or rate adaptation?
Lau CP; Tai YT; Lee PW; Cheung B; Tang MO; Lam WK
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Nov; 17(11 Pt 2):1838-43. PubMed ID: 7845777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limitations of testing methods for evaluation of dual chamber versus single chamber adaptive rate pacing.
Jutzy RV; Florio J; Isaeff DM; Feenstra L; Briggs B; Levine PA
Am J Cardiol; 1991 Dec; 68(17):1715-7. PubMed ID: 1746477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of atrioventricular asynchrony on platelet activation: implication of thromboembolism in paced patients.
Lau CP; Tse HF; Cheng G
Heart; 1997 Oct; 78(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 9404251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-year experience with rate-modulated pacing controlled by mixed venous oxygen saturation.
Windecker S; Bubien RS; Halperin L; Moore A; Kay GN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1396-404. PubMed ID: 9670183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rate augmentation and atrial arrhythmias in DDDR pacing.
Spencer WH; Markowitz T; Alagona P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1847-51. PubMed ID: 1704552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is accurate rate response programming necessary?
Sulke N; Dritsas A; Chambers J; Sowton E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Aug; 13(8):1031-44. PubMed ID: 1697950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single- versus dual-chamber sensor-driven pacing: comparison of cardiac outputs.
Proctor EE; Leman RB; Mann DL; Kaiser J; Kratz J; Gillette P
Am Heart J; 1991 Sep; 122(3 Pt 1):728-32. PubMed ID: 1877449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.
Sweeney MO; Hellkamp AS; Ellenbogen KA; Greenspon AJ; Freedman RA; Lee KL; Lamas GA;
Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(23):2932-7. PubMed ID: 12782566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
