120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17045864)
1. Quantification of hepatic parenchymal blood flow by contrast ultrasonography with flash-replenishment imaging.
Metoki R; Moriyasu F; Kamiyama N; Sugimoto K; Iijima H; Xu HX; Aoki T; Miyata Y; Yamamoto K; Kudo K; Shimizu M; Yamada M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 17045864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative evaluation of microvascular blood flow by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).
Greis C
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2011; 49(1-4):137-49. PubMed ID: 22214685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of flow using ultrasound and microbubbles: a disruption replenishment model based on physical principles.
Hudson JM; Karshafian R; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 35(12):2007-20. PubMed ID: 19822390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microvascular flow estimation by microbubble-assisted Nakagami imaging.
Tsui PH; Yeh CK; Chang CC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 35(4):653-71. PubMed ID: 19097684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of the impact of ultrasound scanner settings and contrast bolus volume on time-intensity curves.
Gauthier TP; Chebil M; Peronneau P; Lassau N
Ultrasonics; 2012 Jan; 52(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 21722933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of the relationship of nonlinear backscattered ultrasound intensity with microbubble concentration at low MI.
Lampaskis M; Averkiou M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 20045592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbubbles as a novel contrast agent for brain MRI.
Cheung JS; Chow AM; Guo H; Wu EX
Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(3):658-64. PubMed ID: 19269337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling ultrasound contrast measurement of blood flow and perfusion in biological tissue.
Thijssen JM; de Korte CL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 31(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 15708468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of the "flash-replenishment" method in contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the quantitative assessment of hepatic microvascular perfusion.
Xie F; Wan WB; Fei X; Zhang MB; Zhang Y; Wang HW; Tang J; Tang WB; Luo YK
Braz J Med Biol Res; 2018; 51(4):e7058. PubMed ID: 29490004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Renal blood flow quantification in pigs using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: an ex vivo study.
Hoeffel C; Mulé S; Huwart L; Frouin F; Jais JP; Helenon O; Correas JM
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Aug; 31(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 20408121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simple method for quantifying ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction.
Hung SH; Yeh CK; Tsai TH; Chen T; Chen RC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 21546152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corrected quantification method to determine myocardial blood flow using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography.
Otani K; Masuda K; Asanuma T; Ishikura F; Beppu S
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Aug; 19(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 16880091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound contrast agents as markers of vascularity and microcirculation.
Greis C
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2009; 43(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 19713597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microcirculation volumetric flow assessment using high-resolution, contrast-assisted images.
Yeh CK; Lu SY; Chen YS
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jan; 55(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 18334315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct and Doppler angle-independent measurement of blood flow velocity in small-diameter vessels using ultrasound microbubbles.
Roy HS; Zuo G; Luo Z; Wu H; Krupka TM; Ran H; Li P; Sun Y; Wang Z; Zheng Y
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 22920365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pressure-dependent attenuation with microbubbles at low mechanical index.
Tang MX; Eckersley RJ; Noble JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 15749561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow quantification with nakagami parametric imaging for suppressing contrast microbubbles attenuation.
Gu X; Wei M; Zong Y; Jiang H; Wan M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):660-9. PubMed ID: 23384469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of acoustic insonation parameters on ultrasound contrast agent destruction.
Yeh CK; Su SY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1281-91. PubMed ID: 18343019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A method to expedite data acquisition for multiple spatial-temporal analyses of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Hansen C; Hüttebräuker N; Wilkening W; Ermert H
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Mar; 56(3):507-19. PubMed ID: 19411210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Furlow B
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(6):547S-61S. PubMed ID: 19584362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
