These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1704597)

  • 1. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Stangl K; Seitz K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2080-5. PubMed ID: 1704597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.
    Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physiologic atrial cardiac pacing for the prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation associated with sick sinus syndrome.
    Otaki M; Inoue T; Kaneda T; Oku H
    ASAIO J; 2002; 48(1):110-2. PubMed ID: 11814087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative effects of atrial and ventricular stimulation on morbidity and mortality in patients with sinus node disease].
    Zanini R; Facchinetti AI; Gallo G; Cazzamalli L; Metra M; Benedini G
    Cardiologia; 1990 Jun; 35(6):499-502. PubMed ID: 2078840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Morbidity and mortality of patients with sinus node disease: comparative effects of atrial and ventricular pacing.
    Zanini R; Facchinetti AI; Gallo G; Cazzamalli L; Bonandi L; Dei Cas L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2076-9. PubMed ID: 1704596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
    Rosenqvist M; Brandt J; Schüller H
    Am Heart J; 1988 Jul; 116(1 Pt 1):16-22. PubMed ID: 3394616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias.
    Sethi KK; Bajaj V; Mohan JC; Arora R; Khalilullah M
    Indian Heart J; 1990; 42(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 2258196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.
    Brandt J; Anderson H; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost benefit analysis of single and dual chamber pacing for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. An economic sensitivity analysis of the literature.
    Sutton R; Bourgeois I
    Eur Heart J; 1996 Apr; 17(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8733091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Incidence and risk indicators of thromboembolism during the acute phase of single chamber ventricular pacing].
    Hayashi Y; Ikeda U; Asai Y; Shimada K
    J Cardiol; 2003 Sep; 42(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 14526659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with different mode of pacing. Long-term follow-up.
    Folino AF; Buja G; Corso L Dal ; Nava A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):260-3. PubMed ID: 9474684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Pacemaker therapy for the sick sinus node syndrome. Does the atrially involved pacemaker system lower the frequency of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic complications as well as mortality?].
    Hofgärtner F; Maier B; Eisele R; Hauber J; Sigel H
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1994 Dec; 119(49):1683-9. PubMed ID: 7988373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome.
    Andersen HR; Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Thuesen L; Mortensen PT; Vesterlund T; Pedersen AK
    Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9086):1210-6. PubMed ID: 9652562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.
    Masumoto H; Ueda Y; Kato R; Usui A; Maseki T; Takagi Y; Usui M
    Europace; 2004 Sep; 6(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 15294270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical safety and efficacy of single-chamber atrial pacing in sick sinus syndrome: long-term follow-up].
    Moríñigo JL; Arribas A; Ledesma C; Sánchez PL; Martín F; Martín Luengo C
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2002 Dec; 55(12):1267-72. PubMed ID: 12459076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chronic atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome. Relevance of clinical characteristics and pacing modalities.
    Sgarbossa EB; Pinski SL; Maloney JD; Simmons TW; Wilkoff BL; Castle LW; Trohman RG
    Circulation; 1993 Sep; 88(3):1045-53. PubMed ID: 8353866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Atrial adaptive rate pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects on exercise capacity and arrhythmias.
    Haywood GA; Katritsis D; Ward J; Leigh-Jones M; Ward DE; Camm AJ
    Br Heart J; 1993 Feb; 69(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8435244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
    Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Vesterlund T; Dalsgaard D; Mortensen LS; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Mar; 32(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 21300730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blind atrial pacing for patients with sinus node disease who develop atrial fibrillation during permanent pacemaker implantation.
    Fyfe T; MacIntyre PD; Robinson JF; Clark AL
    Int J Cardiol; 1997 Jan; 58(2):188-91. PubMed ID: 9049686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of atrial versus atrioventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome during long-term follow-up.
    Kuniewicz M; Rydlewska A; Karkowski G; Lelakowska-Pieła M; Majewski J; Lelakowski J
    Kardiol Pol; 2015; 73(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 25001847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.