204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17046416)
1. Complementing random-digit-dial telephone surveys with other approaches to collecting sensitive data.
Galesic M; Tourangeau R; Couper MP
Am J Prev Med; 2006 Nov; 31(5):437-43. PubMed ID: 17046416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The future of random-digit-dial surveys for injury prevention and violence research.
Link MW; Kresnow MJ
Am J Prev Med; 2006 Nov; 31(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 17046417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Address-based versus random-digit-dial surveys: comparison of key health and risk indicators.
Link MW; Battaglia MP; Frankel MR; Osborn L; Mokdad AH
Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 164(10):1019-25. PubMed ID: 16968861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System: past, present, and future.
Mokdad AH
Annu Rev Public Health; 2009; 30():43-54. PubMed ID: 19705555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Given the increasing bias in random digit dial sampling, could respondent-driven sampling be a practical alternative?
Lee R; Ranaldi J; Cummings M; Crucetti JB; Stratton H; McNutt LA
Ann Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 21(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 21376274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: a comparison of mail, web and telephone approaches.
Link MW; Mokdad AH
J Stud Alcohol; 2005 Mar; 66(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 15957675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Use of Multimode Data Collection in Random Digit Dialing Cell Phone Surveys for Young Adults: Feasibility Study.
Gundersen DA; Wivagg J; Young WJ; Yan T; Delnevo CD
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e31545. PubMed ID: 34932017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating a multimode design into a national random-digit-dialed telephone survey.
Hu SS; Pierannunzi C; Balluz L
Prev Chronic Dis; 2011 Nov; 8(6):A145. PubMed ID: 22005638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can we talk? Importance of random-digit-dial surveys for injury prevention research.
Simon TR; Mercy JA; Barker L
Am J Prev Med; 2006 Nov; 31(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 17046412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences between RDD telephone and ABS mail survey design: coverage, unit nonresponse, and measurement error.
Peytchev A; Ridenhour J; Krotki K
J Health Commun; 2010; 15 Suppl 3():117-34. PubMed ID: 21154088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: response patterns in a survey.
Feveile H; Olsen O; Hogh A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():27. PubMed ID: 17592653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitive topics, survey nonresponse, and considerations for interviewer training.
O'Brien EM; Black MC; Carley-Baxter LR; Simon TR
Am J Prev Med; 2006 Nov; 31(5):419-26. PubMed ID: 17046414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design, characteristics, and usefulness of state-based behavioral risk factor surveillance: 1981-87.
Remington PL; Smith MY; Williamson DF; Anda RF; Gentry EM; Hogelin GC
Public Health Rep; 1988; 103(4):366-75. PubMed ID: 2841712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alternative modes for health surveillance surveys: an experiment with web, mail, and telephone.
Link MW; Mokdad AH
Epidemiology; 2005 Sep; 16(5):701-4. PubMed ID: 16135951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.
McHorney CA; Kosinski M; Ware JE
Med Care; 1994 Jun; 32(6):551-67. PubMed ID: 8189774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodologic changes in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 2011 and potential effects on prevalence estimates.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2012 Jun; 61(22):410-3. PubMed ID: 22672976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches.
Sinclair M; O'Toole J; Malawaraarachchi M; Leder K
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():132. PubMed ID: 22938205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New challenges for telephone survey research in the twenty-first century.
Kempf AM; Remington PL
Annu Rev Public Health; 2007; 28():113-26. PubMed ID: 17094769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
Westrick SC; Mount JK
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fruit and vegetable intake of US adults: comparing intake by mode of survey administration.
Erinosho TO; Thompson OM; Moser RP; Yaroch AL
J Am Diet Assoc; 2011 Mar; 111(3):408-13. PubMed ID: 21338740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
