These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17046845)
1. In silico analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing-based methods for identification of medically important anaerobic bacteria. Woo PC; Chung LM; Teng JL; Tse H; Pang SS; Lau VY; Wong VW; Kam KL; Lau SK; Yuen KY J Clin Pathol; 2007 May; 60(5):576-9. PubMed ID: 17046845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usefulness of the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA bacterial identification system for identification of anaerobic Gram positive bacilli isolated from blood cultures. Lau SK; Ng KH; Woo PC; Yip KT; Fung AM; Woo GK; Chan KM; Que TL; Yuen KY J Clin Pathol; 2006 Feb; 59(2):219-22. PubMed ID: 16443743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In silico analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing based methods for identification of medically important aerobic Gram-negative bacteria. Teng JLL; Yeung MY; Yue G; Au-Yeung RKH; Yeung EYH; Fung AMY; Tse H; Yuen KY; Lau SKP; Woo PCY J Med Microbiol; 2011 Sep; 60(Pt 9):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 21498652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Guidelines for interpretation of 16S rRNA gene sequence-based results for identification of medically important aerobic Gram-positive bacteria. Woo PCY; Teng JLL; Wu JKL; Leung FPS; Tse H; Fung AMY; Lau SKP; Yuen KY J Med Microbiol; 2009 Aug; 58(Pt 8):1030-1036. PubMed ID: 19528178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures by amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene: evaluation of BACTEC 9240 instrument true-positive and false-positive results. Qian Q; Tang YW; Kolbert CP; Torgerson CA; Hughes JG; Vetter EA; Harmsen WS; Montgomery SO; Cockerill FR; Persing DH J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Oct; 39(10):3578-82. PubMed ID: 11574575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Then and now: use of 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories. Woo PC; Lau SK; Teng JL; Tse H; Yuen KY Clin Microbiol Infect; 2008 Oct; 14(10):908-34. PubMed ID: 18828852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Biolog OmniLog Identification System and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing for accuracy in identification of atypical bacteria of clinical origin. Morgan MC; Boyette M; Goforth C; Sperry KV; Greene SR J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Dec; 79(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 19837117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the MicroSeq 500 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing for identification of bacterial isolates that commercial automated systems failed to identify correctly. Fontana C; Favaro M; Pelliccioni M; Pistoia ES; Favalli C J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Feb; 43(2):615-9. PubMed ID: 15695654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of SmartGene IDNS software to partial 16S rRNA gene sequences for a diverse group of bacteria in a clinical laboratory. Simmon KE; Croft AC; Petti CA J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 44(12):4400-6. PubMed ID: 17050811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suitability of partial 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis for the identification of dangerous bacterial pathogens. Ruppitsch W; Stöger A; Indra A; Grif K; Schabereiter-Gurtner C; Hirschl A; Allerberger F J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 102(3):852-9. PubMed ID: 17309636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA-based gene sequencing for the diagnosis of culture-negative bacterial meningitis. Arosio M; Nozza F; Rizzi M; Ruggeri M; Casella P; Beretta G; Raglio A; Goglio A New Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 31(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 18843888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a selection strategy before use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for the identification of clinically significant gram-negative rods and coccobacilli. Mahlen SD; Clarridge JE Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 136(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 21846913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of the MicroSeq 500 16S ribosomal DNA-based bacterial identification system for identification of clinically significant bacterial isolates with ambiguous biochemical profiles. Woo PC; Ng KH; Lau SK; Yip KT; Fung AM; Leung KW; Tam DM; Que TL; Yuen KY J Clin Microbiol; 2003 May; 41(5):1996-2001. PubMed ID: 12734240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the colorimetric VITEK 2 card for identification of gram-negative nonfermentative rods: comparison to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Zbinden A; Böttger EC; Bosshard PP; Zbinden R J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 45(7):2270-3. PubMed ID: 17507509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Globicatella bacteraemia identified by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Lau SK; Woo PC; Li NK; Teng JL; Leung KW; Ng KH; Que TL; Yuen KY J Clin Pathol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 16505283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [16S rRNA gene sequencing for pathogen identification from clinical specimens]. Lu XX; Wu W; Wang M; Huang YF Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 88(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 18353221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ribosomal DNA sequencing: experiences from use in the Danish National Reference Laboratory for Identification of Bacteria. Christensen JJ; Andresen K; Justesen T; Kemp M APMIS; 2005 Sep; 113(9):621-8. PubMed ID: 16218938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 16S rRNA gene sequencing versus the API 20 NE system and the VITEK 2 ID-GNB card for identification of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria in the clinical laboratory. Bosshard PP; Zbinden R; Abels S; Böddinghaus B; Altwegg M; Böttger EC J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 44(4):1359-66. PubMed ID: 16597863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of 16SpathDB 2.0, an automated 16S rRNA gene sequence database, using 689 complete bacterial genomes. Teng JL; Ho TC; Yeung RS; Wong AY; Wang H; Chen C; Fung KS; Lau SK; Woo PC Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2014 Feb; 78(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 24295571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]