264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17046978)
1. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unequal group variances in microarray data analyses.
Demissie M; Mascialino B; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(9):1168-74. PubMed ID: 18344518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
Liu P; Hwang JT
Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.
Pounds S; Cheng C
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
Datta S; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploiting sample variability to enhance multivariate analysis of microarray data.
Möller-Levet CS; West CM; Miller CJ
Bioinformatics; 2007 Oct; 23(20):2733-40. PubMed ID: 17827205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Gibbs sampler for the identification of gene expression and network connectivity consistency.
Brynildsen MP; Tran LM; Liao JC
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3040-6. PubMed ID: 17060361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sample size determination for the false discovery rate.
Pounds S; Cheng C
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4263-71. PubMed ID: 16204346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportion.
Korn EL; Li MC; McShane LM; Simon R
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4428-40. PubMed ID: 17357994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
Jung SH
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. twilight; a Bioconductor package for estimating the local false discovery rate.
Scheid S; Spang R
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2921-2. PubMed ID: 15817688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis.
Huang J; Gusnanto A; O'Sullivan K; Staaf J; Borg A; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2463-9. PubMed ID: 17660206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
Gao X
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Degrees of differential gene expression: detecting biologically significant expression differences and estimating their magnitudes.
Bickel DR
Bioinformatics; 2004 Mar; 20(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 15033875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
