BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1037 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17047187)

  • 1. Increasing R01 competition concerns researchers.
    Vastag B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Oct; 98(20):1436-8. PubMed ID: 17047187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stat bite: NCI R01 success rates, 1970-2005.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Oct; 98(20):1437. PubMed ID: 17047188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
    Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stat bite: NIH, NCI appropriations, 1997-2007.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):376. PubMed ID: 16537826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A lost generation.
    Weinberg RA
    Cell; 2006 Jul; 126(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 16839866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NIH, related agencies face flat budget future.
    Finkelstein JB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):376-7. PubMed ID: 16537827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Budget cuts and the plight of postdocs.
    Goozner M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Feb; 105(3):153-4. PubMed ID: 23334223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
    Max MB
    J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NIH funding of the independent investigator.
    Boron WF
    Physiology (Bethesda); 2006 Oct; 21():300-1. PubMed ID: 16990450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Declines in NIH R01 research grant funding.
    Mandel HG; Vesell ES
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):189. PubMed ID: 18845728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research funding. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research.
    Teitelbaum MS
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5889):644-5. PubMed ID: 18669847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Windfall warning.
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grants on the run.
    Jeyaseelan S
    Science; 2009 Jan; 323(5912):337. PubMed ID: 19150826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex Differences in Institutional Support for Junior Biomedical Researchers.
    Sege R; Nykiel-Bub L; Selk S
    JAMA; 2015 Sep; 314(11):1175-7. PubMed ID: 26372589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH career awards. Young scientists get a helping hand.
    Bhatttacharjee Y
    Science; 2005 Dec; 310(5754):1601. PubMed ID: 16339420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why aren't there more scientists advocating for funding?
    Wells RD; Farnham P
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1081. PubMed ID: 17110554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Invest in postdocs.
    Hoff KG
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):880. PubMed ID: 19443765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Career transitions. Panel throws lifeline to bio postdocs.
    Bhattacharjee Y
    Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5717):1849. PubMed ID: 15790812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The NIH, research institutions and industry: working together on a shared goal.
    Omary MB
    Gastroenterology; 2007 May; 132(5):1647-50. PubMed ID: 17484859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NIH common fund concerns some in cancer research community.
    Vanchieri C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):345. PubMed ID: 17341723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.