215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17047268)
1. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography.
Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Yaffe M; Alm Carlsson G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.
Zankl M; Fill U; Hoeschen C; Panzer W; Regulla D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):410-4. PubMed ID: 15933148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit.
Hemdal B; Herrnsdorf L; Andersson I; Bengtsson G; Heddson B; Olsson M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation.
Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4221-35. PubMed ID: 17153401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient dose in digital mammography.
Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation doses in volume-of-interest breast computed tomography--A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Yi Y; Wang T; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):3063-75. PubMed ID: 26127058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo simulation for correlation analysis of average glandular dose by breast thickness and glandular ratio in breast tissue.
Kim ST; Cho JK
Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 24704647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimisation of X-ray examinations in Lithuania: start of implementation in mammography.
Adliene D; Adlys G; Cerapaite R; Jonaitiene E; Cibulskaite I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15933145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normalized average glandular dose in magnification mammography.
Liu B; Goodsitt M; Chan HP
Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7568836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Glandular dose indices using a glandular dose to air kerma volume histogram in mammography.
Shinohara S; Araki F; Ohno T
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1340-1348. PubMed ID: 31859402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography.
Hoeschen C; Fill U; Zankl M; Panzer W; Regulla D; Döhring W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):406-9. PubMed ID: 15933147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. INSTITUTIONAL BREAST DOSES IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY.
Lekatou A; Metaxas V; Messaris G; Antzele P; Tzavellas G; Panayiotakis G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):239-251. PubMed ID: 30753684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of x-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations.
Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1919-35. PubMed ID: 22421418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [An improved method for determining the mean parenchyma dose in mammography].
Klein R; Aichinger H; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):394-7. PubMed ID: 8580142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit.
Rosado-Méndez I; Palma BA; Brandan ME
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5544-57. PubMed ID: 19175112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
