128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17047270)
1. The unique determination of the primary current by MEG and EEG.
Peng L; Cheng J; Jin L
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5565-80. PubMed ID: 17047270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neuronal currents and EEG-MEG fields.
Dassios G
Math Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 25(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 18413352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A technique to consider mismatches between fMRI and EEG/MEG sources for fMRI-constrained EEG/MEG source imaging: a preliminary simulation study.
Im CH; Lee SY
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6005-21. PubMed ID: 17110766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multiresolution framework to MEG/EEG source imaging.
Gavit L; Baillet S; Mangin JF; Pescatore J; Garnero L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Oct; 48(10):1080-7. PubMed ID: 11585031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Numerical aspects of spatio-temporal current density reconstruction from EEG-/MEG-data.
Schmitt U; Louis AK; Darvas F; Buchner H; Fuchs M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Apr; 20(4):314-24. PubMed ID: 11370898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of skull resistivity on the spatial resolutions of EEG and MEG.
Malmivuo JA; Suihko VE
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 15248545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatiotemporal noise covariance estimation from limited empirical magnetoencephalographic data.
Jun SC; Plis SM; Ranken DM; Schmidt DM
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5549-64. PubMed ID: 17047269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analytic expansion of the EEG lead field for realistic volume conductors.
Nolte G; Dassios G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3807-23. PubMed ID: 16077228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generalized head models for MEG/EEG: boundary element method beyond nested volumes.
Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1333-46. PubMed ID: 16481698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of head shape variations among individuals on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse problems.
von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Wagner M; Nehorai A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):587-97. PubMed ID: 19389682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity distributions of EEG and MEG measurements.
Malmivuo J; Suihko V; Eskola H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Mar; 44(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 9216133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of quasi-static magnetic reciprocity to finite element models of the MEG lead-field.
Schimpf PH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 54(11):2082-8. PubMed ID: 18018704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast multipole acceleration of the MEG/EEG boundary element method.
Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4695-710. PubMed ID: 16177498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of mutual information on independent component analysis in EEG/MEG analysis: a simulation study.
Neumann A; Grosse-Wentrup M; Buss M; Gramann K
Int J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 118(11):1534-46. PubMed ID: 18853332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimum Overlap Component Analysis (MOCA) of EEG/MEG data for more than two sources.
Nolte G; Marzetti L; Valdes Sosa P
J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Sep; 183(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 19596027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
