128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17047270)
21. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.
Maris E; Oostenveld R
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Aug; 164(1):177-90. PubMed ID: 17517438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The adjoint method for general EEG and MEG sensor-based lead field equations.
Vallaghé S; Papadopoulo T; Clerc M
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(1):135-47. PubMed ID: 19075359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Simultaneous magnetoencephalography and intracranial EEG registration: technical and clinical aspects.
Santiuste M; Nowak R; Russi A; Tarancon T; Oliver B; Ayats E; Scheler G; Graetz G
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 25(6):331-9. PubMed ID: 18997623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MEG forward problem formulation using equivalent surface current densities.
von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Nehorai A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1210-7. PubMed ID: 16041984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Signal processing in magnetoencephalography.
Vrba J; Robinson SE
Methods; 2001 Oct; 25(2):249-71. PubMed ID: 11812209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Regional resolving power of combined MEG/EEG.
Pflieger ME; Greenblatt RE; Kirkish J
Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():79. PubMed ID: 16012620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Calibration of a multichannel MEG system based on the signal space separation method.
Chella F; Zappasodi F; Marzetti L; Della Penna S; Pizzella V
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(15):4855-70. PubMed ID: 22797687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A probabilistic algorithm integrating source localization and noise suppression for MEG and EEG data.
Zumer JM; Attias HT; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):102-15. PubMed ID: 17574444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An automatic procedure for the analysis of electric and magnetic mismatch negativity based on anatomical brain mapping.
Zvyagintsev M; Thönnessen H; Dammers J; Boers F; Mathiak K
J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 168(2):325-33. PubMed ID: 18093661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
Gençer NG; Acar CE
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of sensor calibration, balancing and parametrization on the signal space separation method.
Nurminen J; Taulu S; Okada Y
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1975-87. PubMed ID: 18354243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spatial filtering of MEG signals for user-specified spherical regions.
Ozkurt TE; Sun M; Jia W; Sclabassi RJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Oct; 56(10):2429-38. PubMed ID: 19527953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multivariate reconstruction of functional networks from cortical sources dynamics in MEG/EEG.
Dossevi A; Cosmelli D; Garnero L; Ammari H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Aug; 55(8):2074-86. PubMed ID: 18632370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Introducing priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
Garnero L; Baillet S; Marin G; Renault B; Guérin C; Meunier G
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1999; 50():183-9. PubMed ID: 10689461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The magnetic field inside special conducting geometries due to internal current.
Heller L; Ranken D; Best E
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1310-8. PubMed ID: 15311815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. MEG versus EEG: influence of background activity on interictal spike detection.
Ramantani G; Boor R; Paetau R; Ille N; Feneberg R; Rupp A; Boppel T; Scherg M; Rating D; Bast T
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Dec; 23(6):498-508. PubMed ID: 17143138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Continuous head-localization and data correction in a whole-cortex MEG sensor.
Wilson HS
Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():56. PubMed ID: 16012679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors influencing the spatial precision of electromagnetic tracking systems used for MEG/EEG source imaging.
Engels L; De Tiege X; Op de Beeck M; Warzée N
Neurophysiol Clin; 2010 Mar; 40(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 20230932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MEG/EEG sources of the 170-ms response to faces are co-localized in the fusiform gyrus.
Deffke I; Sander T; Heidenreich J; Sommer W; Curio G; Trahms L; Lueschow A
Neuroimage; 2007 May; 35(4):1495-501. PubMed ID: 17363282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
