These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17047531)

  • 21. Trunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workers.
    Kurustien N; Mekhora K; Jalayondeja W; Nanthavanij S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Jul; 97 Suppl 7():S75-9. PubMed ID: 25141532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fast development of high intra-abdominal pressure when a trained participant is exposed to heavy, sudden trunk loads.
    Essendrop M; Trojel Hye-Knudsen C; Skotte J; Faber Hansen A; Schibye B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 14699283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins.
    Ferguson SA; Gaudes-MacLaren LL; Marras WS; Waters TR; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 2002 May; 45(6):399-414. PubMed ID: 12061965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of lifting belt use on multijoint motion and load bearing during repetitive and asymmetric lifting.
    Sparto PJ; Parnianpour M; Reinsel TE; Simon S
    J Spinal Disord; 1998 Feb; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 9493771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of a lifting belt on spine moments and muscle recruitments after unexpected sudden loading.
    Lavender SA; Shakeel K; Andersson GB; Thomas JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun; 25(12):1569-78. PubMed ID: 10851108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of ship motion on spinal loading during manual lifting.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Delleman NJ; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2008 Sep; 51(9):1426-40. PubMed ID: 18802823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of soft lumbar support belt on abdominal oblique muscle activity in nonimpaired adults during squat lifting.
    Warren LP; Appling S; Oladehin A; Griffin J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2001 Jun; 31(6):316-23. PubMed ID: 11411626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Trunk muscle activation and low back loading in lifting in the absence of load knowledge.
    de Looze MP; Boeken-Kruger MC; Steenhuizen S; Baten CT; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2000 Mar; 43(3):333-44. PubMed ID: 10755657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using sitting as a component of job rotation strategies: are lifting/lowering kinetics and kinematics altered following prolonged sitting.
    Howarth SJ; Beach TA; Pearson AJ; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 19081557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of the abdominal belt on muscle-generated spinal stability and L4/L5 joint compression force.
    Ivancic PC; Cholewicki J; Radebold A
    Ergonomics; 2002 Jun; 45(7):501-13. PubMed ID: 12167204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of different levels of torso coactivation on trunk muscular and kinematic responses to posteriorly applied sudden loads.
    Vera-Garcia FJ; Brown SH; Gray JR; McGill SM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jun; 21(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 16442677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spinal loading during manual materials handling in a kneeling posture.
    Splittstoesser RE; Yang G; Knapik GG; Trippany DR; Hoyle JA; Lahoti P; Korkmaz SV; Sommerich CM; Lavender SA; Marras WS
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 16517181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence for a role of antagonistic cocontraction in controlling trunk stiffness during lifting.
    van Dieën JH; Kingma I; van der Bug P
    J Biomech; 2003 Dec; 36(12):1829-36. PubMed ID: 14614936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transverse-contour modeling of trunk muscle-distributed forces and spinal loads during lifting and twisting.
    Davis JR; Mirka GA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 10685481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of low back kinetic estimates obtained through posture matching, rigid link modeling and an EMG-assisted model.
    Parkinson RJ; Bezaire M; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2011 Jul; 42(5):644-51. PubMed ID: 21055725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomechanics of the squat exercise using a modified center of mass bar.
    Lander JE; Bates BT; Devita P
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1986 Aug; 18(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 3747809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sensitivity of kinematics-based model predictions to optimization criteria in static lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):504-14. PubMed ID: 16288897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of back belts on lumbar muscle fatigue.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jun; 20(11):1271-8; discussion 1278. PubMed ID: 7660236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.