327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17048029)
1. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws.
Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 17048029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film.
Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography.
Patel S; Dawood A; Mannocci F; Wilson R; Pitt Ford T
Int Endod J; 2009 Jun; 42(6):507-15. PubMed ID: 19298574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption.
Durack C; Patel S; Davies J; Wilson R; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2011 Feb; 44(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 21083575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
Molander B
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peri-implant assessment via cone beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography: an ex vivo study.
Silveira-Neto N; Flores ME; De Carli JP; Costa MD; Matos FS; Paranhos LR; Linden MSS
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2017 Nov; 72(11):708-713. PubMed ID: 29236918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of limited-volume cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of periapical bone loss: 360° scans versus 180° scans.
Lennon S; Patel S; Foschi F; Wilson R; Davies J; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2011 Dec; 44(12):1118-27. PubMed ID: 21895701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection and measurement of artificial periapical lesions by cone-beam computed tomography.
Liang YH; Jiang L; Gao XJ; Shemesh H; Wesselink PR; Wu MK
Int Endod J; 2014 Apr; 47(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 23815501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 2: a 1-year post-treatment follow-up.
Patel S; Wilson R; Dawood A; Foschi F; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):711-23. PubMed ID: 22775142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does a combination of two radiographs increase accuracy in detecting acid-induced periapical lesions and does it approach the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography scanning?
Soğur E; Gröndahl HG; Baksı BG; Mert A
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 22244624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detectability of chemically induced periapical lesions by limited cone beam computed tomography, intra-oral digital and conventional film radiography.
Sogur E; Baksi BG; Gröndahl HG; Lomcali G; Sen BH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):458-64. PubMed ID: 19767516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiographic evaluation on the assessment of periapical bone destruction in dog's teeth.
Ordinola-Zapata R; Bramante CM; Duarte MH; Ramos Fernandes LM; Camargo EJ; de Moraes IG; Bernardineli N; Vivan RR; Capelozza AL; Garcia RB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 21530334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images.
Mistak EJ; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; West LA; Runyan DA
J Endod; 1998 Apr; 24(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9641132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The detection of simulated periapical lesions in human dry mandibles with cone-beam computed tomography: a dose reduction study.
Al-Nuaimi N; Patel S; Foschi F; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2016 Nov; 49(11):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 26485615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the periapical bone defect 1 week and 12 months after root-end resection.
Christiansen R; Kirkevang LL; Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Dec; 38(8):531-6. PubMed ID: 20026710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam computed tomography in mandibular molars for analysis of anatomical landmarks before apical surgery.
Bornstein MM; Lauber R; Sendi P; von Arx T
J Endod; 2011 Feb; 37(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 21238794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral digital radiography for assessment of tooth root lesions.
Kumar V; Gossett L; Blattner A; Iwasaki LR; Williams K; Nickel JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e533-41. PubMed ID: 21640865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions.
Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 18195250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles.
Mengel R; Kruse B; Flores-de-Jacoby L
J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 16805688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
