424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17049030)
1. A method to increase the power of multiple testing procedures through sample splitting.
Rubin D; Dudoit S; van der Laan M
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article19. PubMed ID: 17049030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates.
Dudoit S; van der Laan MJ; Pollard KS
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article13. PubMed ID: 16646791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Empirical Bayes and resampling based multiple testing procedure controlling tail probability of the proportion of false positives.
van der Laan MJ; Birkner MD; Hubbard AE
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article29. PubMed ID: 16646847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
Senn S; Bretz F
Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple test procedures using an upper bound of the number of true hypotheses and their use for evaluating high-dimensional EEG data.
Hemmelmann C; Ziegler A; Guiard V; Weiss S; Walther M; Vollandt R
J Neurosci Methods; 2008 May; 170(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 18279970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimized multi-stage designs controlling the false discovery or the family-wise error rate.
Zehetmayer S; Bauer P; Posch M
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4145-60. PubMed ID: 18444249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.
Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. Control of the false discovery rate applied to the detection of positively selected amino acid sites.
Guindon S; Black M; Rodrigo A;
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 May; 23(5):919-26. PubMed ID: 16423864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses.
Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives.
van der Laan MJ; Dudoit S; Pollard KS
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article15. PubMed ID: 16646793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On estimation of the variance in Cochran-Armitage trend tests for genetic association using case-control studies.
Zheng G; Gastwirth JL
Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3150-9. PubMed ID: 16397860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Constructing multiple test procedures for partially ordered hypothesis sets.
Edwards D; Madsen J
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5116-24. PubMed ID: 17476650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data.
Lai Y
Biostatistics; 2007 Oct; 8(4):744-55. PubMed ID: 17244594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The problem of multiple testing and solutions for genome-wide studies].
Gyorffy B; Gyorffy A; Tulassay Z
Orv Hetil; 2005 Mar; 146(12):559-63. PubMed ID: 15853065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Compatible simultaneous lower confidence bounds for the Holm procedure and other Bonferroni-based closed tests.
Strassburger K; Bretz F
Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4914-27. PubMed ID: 18618415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample size calculation for simulation-based multiple-testing procedures.
Bang H; Jung SH; George SL
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):957-67. PubMed ID: 16279354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A powerful truncated tail strength method for testing multiple null hypotheses in one dataset.
Jiang B; Zhang X; Zuo Y; Kang G
J Theor Biol; 2011 May; 277(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 21295595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parameter-free testing of the shape of a probability distribution.
Broom M; Nouvellet P; Bacon JP; Waxman D
Biosystems; 2007; 90(2):509-15. PubMed ID: 17293028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hypothesis testing in a mixture case-control model.
Qin J; Liang KY
Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):182-93. PubMed ID: 20345497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
