BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17049809)

  • 1. A genetic algorithm design for microcalcification detection and classification in digital mammograms.
    Jiang J; Yao B; Wason AM
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Jan; 31(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 17049809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Topological modeling and classification of mammographic microcalcification clusters.
    Chen Z; Strange H; Oliver A; Denton ER; Boggis C; Zwiggelaar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Apr; 62(4):1203-14. PubMed ID: 25546849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A swarm optimized neural network system for classification of microcalcification in mammograms.
    Dheeba J; Selvi ST
    J Med Syst; 2012 Oct; 36(5):3051-61. PubMed ID: 21947904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated Detection and Classification of Microcalcification Clusters with Enhanced Preprocessing and Fractal Analysis.
    Gowri V; Valluvan KR; Chamundeeswari VV
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Nov; 19(11):3093-3098. PubMed ID: 30486547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for the segmentation of microcalcification clusters in mammograms.
    Gavrielides MA; Lo JY; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2002 Apr; 29(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 11998828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Milosevic M; Jankovic D; Peulic A
    Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(5):701-15. PubMed ID: 25059254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
    Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
    Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A computer-aided diagnosis system for digital mammograms based on fuzzy-neural and feature extraction techniques.
    Verma B; Zakos J
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2001 Mar; 5(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11300216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme using a filter bank for detection of microcalcification clusters in mammograms.
    Nakayama R; Uchiyama Y; Yamamoto K; Watanabe R; Namba K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Feb; 53(2):273-83. PubMed ID: 16485756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications.
    El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Wernick MN; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1552-63. PubMed ID: 12588039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Detection of microcalcification clusters regions in mammograms combining discriminative deep belief networks].
    Song L; Wei X; Wang Q; Wang Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 38(2):268-275. PubMed ID: 33913286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet filter and Markov random field model.
    Yu SN; Li KY; Huang YK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Apr; 30(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 16723208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications.
    Fu JC; Lee SK; Wong ST; Yeh JY; Wang AH; Wu HK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Sep; 29(6):419-29. PubMed ID: 16002263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
    Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
    J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Independent evaluation of computer classification of malignant and benign calcifications in full-field digital mammograms.
    Rana RS; Jiang Y; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Liu B
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 17307670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications.
    Chan HP; Helvie MA; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Blane CE; Joynt LK; Wilson TE; Hadjiiski LM; Goodsitt MM
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Jun; 8(6):454-66. PubMed ID: 11394537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Threshold pixel size for shape determination of microcalcifications in digital mammography: a pilot study.
    Ruschin M; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Börjesson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Grahn A; Tingberg A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):415-23. PubMed ID: 15933149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision optimization of case-based computer-aided decision systems using genetic algorithms with application to mammography.
    Mazurowski MA; Habas PA; Zurada JM; Tourassi GD
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(4):895-908. PubMed ID: 18263947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films.
    Yu S; Guan L
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Feb; 19(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 10784283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.