902 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17050277)
1. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry.
Punjabi OS; Ho HK; Kniestedt C; Bostrom AG; Stamper RL; Lin SC
Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contour tonometry in primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma: factors associated with intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude.
Moghimi S; Torabi H; Fakhraie G; Nassiri N; Mohammadi M
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013; 20(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 23741135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude].
Colás-Tomás T; Prieto-Del Cura M; Villafruela-Güemes I; Clariana-Martín A; Valdivia-Pérez A
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical assessment of dynamic contour tonometer].
Shi W; Zhong Y; Dong FT; Xu P; Wang RY
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 44(5):408-12. PubMed ID: 18953894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effect of Morphological and Functional Parameters on Ocular Pulse Amplitudes: An Analysis in Ocular Hypertension and Different Types of Glaucoma].
Milioti G; Langenbucher A; Seitz B; Löw U
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2017 Feb; 234(2):223-230. PubMed ID: 27130975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Ledoux A; Pourjavan S
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2007 Mar; 30(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 17417152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting ocular pulse amplitude in eyes with open angle glaucoma and glaucoma-suspect eyes.
Choi J; Lee J; Park SB; Lee KS; Sung KR; Kook MS
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 90(6):552-8. PubMed ID: 20560890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude.
Erickson DH; Goodwin D; Rollins M; Belaustegui A; Anderson C
Optometry; 2009 Apr; 80(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 19329059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
Wang J; Cayer MM; Descovich D; Kamdeu-Fansi A; Harasymowycz PJ; Li G; Lesk MR
J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Nessim M; Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry.
Kniestedt C; Lin S; Choe J; Bostrom A; Nee M; Stamper RL
Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 123(11):1532-7. PubMed ID: 16286615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical utility of dynamic contour tonometry and ocular pulse amplitude.
Weizer JS; Asrani S; Stinnett SS; Herndon LW
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):700-3. PubMed ID: 18091458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
