These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17050311)

  • 1. Effect of deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array on pitch estimation and speech perception.
    Hamzavi J; Arnoldner C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 126(11):1182-7. PubMed ID: 17050311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 21248642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear implant channel separation and its influence on speech perception--implications for a new electrode design.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Hamzavi JS
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(5):313-24. PubMed ID: 17536200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results.
    Hochmair I; Arnold W; Nopp P; Jolly C; Müller J; Roland P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jun; 123(5):612-7. PubMed ID: 12875584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Basal turn cochleostomy via the middle fossa route for cochlear implant insertion.
    Colletti V; Fiorino FG; Carner M; Pacini L
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):778-84. PubMed ID: 9831154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing results with deep insertion of cochlear implant electrodes.
    Hodges AV; Villasuso E; Balkany T; Bird PA; Butts S; Lee D; Gomez O
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 9918173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Otosclerosis: mid-term results of cochlear implantation.
    Sainz M; García-Valdecasas J; Garófano M; Ballesteros JM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 17675831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function.
    Baumann U; Nobbe A
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 16442249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation].
    Neumann M; Aschendorff A; Schipper J; Laszig R; Klenzner T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15712047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach.
    Erixon E; Köbler S; Rask-Andersen H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 22667762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting.
    Gani M; Valentini G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Boëx C
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 17216585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing preservation via a cochleostomy approach and deep insertion of a standard length cochlear implant electrode.
    Bruce IA; Bates JE; Melling C; Mawman D; Green KM
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Dec; 32(9):1444-7. PubMed ID: 22089957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partial and double-array implantation of the ossified cochlea.
    Roland JT; Coelho DH; Pantelides H; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1068-75. PubMed ID: 18833022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiological outcome of the pull-back technique in cochlear implantees.
    Basta D; Todt I; Ernst A
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Jul; 120(7):1391-6. PubMed ID: 20564720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short electrode insertion in cochlear implantation: speech perception performance of Cantonese-speaking subjects.
    Chu KM; Au DK; Hui Y; Chow CK; Wei WI
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):718-24. PubMed ID: 16012033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.