512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17051689)
1. The brain-disordered defendant: neuroscience and legal insanity in the twenty-first century.
Redding RE
Am Univ Law Rev; 2006 Oct; 56(1):51-127. PubMed ID: 17051689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Criminal madness: cultural iconography and insanity.
Covey RD
Stanford Law Rev; 2009 Apr; 61(6):1375-428. PubMed ID: 19489183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Without thinking: impulsive aggression and criminal responsibility.
Shuman DW; Gold LH
Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(6):723-34. PubMed ID: 19039791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In quest of constitutional principles of "neurolaw".
Pizzetti FG
Med Secoli; 2011; 23(3):963-90. PubMed ID: 23057208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary: evidence-based practice and forensic psychiatry.
Schneider RD
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 20018998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
Bolechała F
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unfitness to plead in England and Wales: Historical development and contemporary dilemmas.
Brown P
Med Sci Law; 2019 Jul; 59(3):187-196. PubMed ID: 31204577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A healer or an executioner? The proper role of a psychiatrist in a criminal justice system.
Dolin G
J Law Health; 2002-2003; 17(2):169-216. PubMed ID: 15853125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New neuroscience, old problems: legal implications of brain science.
Morse SJ
Cerebrum; 2004; 6(4):81-90. PubMed ID: 15986539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Asking the impossible: the negligence liability of the mentally ill.
Goldstein EJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1995; 12(1):67-92. PubMed ID: 8907105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
LeBlanc SM
Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Forensic psychiatry, neuroscience, and the law.
Silva JA
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):489-502. PubMed ID: 20018997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of legal competency in patients with frontal lobe injury.
Reid-Proctor GM; Galin K; Cummings MA
Brain Inj; 2001 May; 15(5):377-86. PubMed ID: 11350652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Causality in criminal forensic and in civil disability cases: Legal and psychological comparison.
Young G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():114-20. PubMed ID: 26325348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Slater Method.
Wall BW; Krupp BH
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):525-6. PubMed ID: 14974810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cognitive neuroscience and the law.
Garland B; Glimcher PW
Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2006 Apr; 16(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 16563731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neuroscience and crime.
Markowitsch HJ
Neurocase; 2008; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18569726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Voluntariness, intention, and the defence of mental disorder: toward a rational approach.
McSherry B
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):581-99. PubMed ID: 14502690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Judgments of competency to stand trial.
Schacht TE
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(1):134; author reply 134-5. PubMed ID: 15809258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
