BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17052467)

  • 1. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study.
    Raigrodski AJ; Chiche GJ; Potiket N; Hochstedler JL; Mohamed SE; Billiot S; Mercante DE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 17052467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical efficacy of veneered zirconium dioxide-based posterior partial fixed dental prostheses: five-year results.
    Raigrodski AJ; Yu A; Chiche GJ; Hochstedler JL; Mancl LA; Mohamed SE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):214-22. PubMed ID: 23031727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses: three-year clinical results.
    Peláez J; Cogolludo PG; Serrano B; Lozano JF; Suárez MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 22633593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A four-year prospective clinical evaluation of zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses.
    Pelaez J; Cogolludo PG; Serrano B; Serrano JF; Suarez MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 22930766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: a prospective clinical 3-year follow-up.
    Schmitt J; Holst S; Wichmann M; Reich S; Gollner M; Hamel J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 19918596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up.
    Sailer I; Gottnerb J; Kanelb S; Hammerle CH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 19918588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
    Vult von Steyern P
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 19639075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures.
    Sailer I; Fehér A; Filser F; Gauckler LJ; Lüthy H; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 17695869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: four-year clinical results.
    Roediger M; Gersdorff N; Huels A; Rinke S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 20305852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
    Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
    Reich S; Kappe K; Teschner H; Schmitt J
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 19049530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 3-year retrospective and clinical follow-up study of zirconia single crowns performed in a private practice.
    Ortorp A; Kihl ML; Carlsson GE
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 19564070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective observation of a new bioactive luting cement: 2-year follow-up.
    Jefferies SR; Pameijer CH; Appleby DC; Boston D; Galbraith C; Lööf J; Glantz PO
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jan; 21(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 22040467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical behavior of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures made of DC-Zirkon: 3-year results.
    Tinschert J; Schulze KA; Natt G; Latzke P; Heussen N; Spiekermann H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 18548959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.