These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17052470)

  • 21. Wear of feldspathic ceramic, nano-filled composite resin and acrylic resin artificial teeth when opposed to different antagonists.
    Ghazal M; Hedderich J; Kern M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 19049531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of wear: enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy.
    Ramp MH; Suzuki S; Cox CF; Lacefield WR; Koth DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 May; 77(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 9151273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro wear evaluation of dental materials in primary teeth.
    da Cunha MR; Puppin-Rontani RM; Ferracane JL; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):364-9. PubMed ID: 17212079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Wear of enamel cusps opposed by posterior composite resin.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):885-90. PubMed ID: 20830885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro human enamel wear by a hydrated high-alkali porcelain.
    O'Kray HP; O'Brien WJ
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Sep; 36(8):617-22. PubMed ID: 16161464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of post-etching cleaning and connecting porcelain on the microtensile bond strength of composite resin to feldspathic porcelain.
    Magne P; Cascione D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 17098499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enamel wear caused by three different restorative materials.
    Hudson JD; Goldstein GR; Georgescu M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 8778391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material.
    Hahnel S; Behr M; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19328280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surface wear on cervical restorations and adjacent enamel and root cementum caused by simulated long-term maintenance therapy.
    Rühling A; Wulf J; Schwahn C; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 15016258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion.
    Tanoue N; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 10898845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Localized three-body wear of resin composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():19-27. PubMed ID: 8935090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The abrasive effect of a porcelain and a nickel-chromium alloy on the wear of human enamel and the influence of a carbonated beverage on the rate of wear.
    Joshi N; Patil NP; Patil SB
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 19(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 20113396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative measurement of tooth and ceramic wear: in vivo study.
    Etman MK; Woolford M; Dunne S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 18548965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vivo wear ranking of some restorative materials.
    Dahl BL; Oilo G
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):561-5. PubMed ID: 7568705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Initial enamel wear of glazed and polished leucite-based porcelains with different fusing temperatures.
    Adachi LK; Saiki M; de Campos TN; Adachi EM; Shinkai RS
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 19903616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vivo wear of enamel by a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic used for posterior fixed partial dentures: first-year results.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Young H; Jones J; Yang M; Anusavice KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 16900824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator.
    Mehl C; Scheibner S; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1382-9. PubMed ID: 17210173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.