240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17052649)
1. Extended apical enlargement with hand files versus rotary NiTi files. Part II.
Bartha T; Kalwitzki M; Löst C; Weiger R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov; 102(5):692-7. PubMed ID: 17052649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The effect of instrumentation on original apical foramen shape using steel vs niti rotatory: computerized analysis].
Gallina G; Cumbo E; Gallo P; Pizzo G; D'Angelo M
Minerva Stomatol; 2002; 51(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 11845115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of cervical preflaring using different rotary nickel-titanium systems on the accuracy of apical file size determination.
Tennert C; Herbert J; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT
J Endod; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1669-72. PubMed ID: 20850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vivo evaluation of two types of files used to accurately determine the diameter of the apical constriction of a root canal: an in vivo study.
Darda S; Manwar N; Chandak M; Shori DD
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jul; 10(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 19575053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vivo comparison of the Root ZX II, the Apex NRG XFR, and Mini Apex Locator by using rotary nickel-titanium files.
Siu C; Marshall JG; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):962-5. PubMed ID: 19567315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinical method to determine the optimal apical preparation size. Part I.
Weiger R; Bartha T; Kalwitzki M; Löst C
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov; 102(5):686-91. PubMed ID: 17052648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of LightSpeed LS1 and LightSpeed LSX NiTi rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in simulated root canals.
Iqbal MK; Banfield B; Lavorini A; Bachstein B
J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 17320711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison in vivo of the first tapered and nontapered instruments that bind at the apical constriction.
Kfir A; Rosenberg E; Fuss Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Sep; 102(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 16920549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals.
Weiger R; ElAyouti A; Löst C
J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):580-3. PubMed ID: 12184418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preparation of curved root canals with rotary FlexMaster instruments compared to Lightspeed instruments and NiTi hand files.
Weiger R; Brückner M; ElAyouti A; Löst C
Int Endod J; 2003 Jul; 36(7):483-90. PubMed ID: 12823704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of apical constriction diameter on Root ZX apex locator precision.
Herrera M; Abalos C; Planas AJ; Llamas R
J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):995-8. PubMed ID: 17878091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of root canal curvatures before and after canal preparation (part II): A method based on numeric calculus.
Sonntag D; Stachniss-Carp S; Stachniss C; Stachniss V
Aust Endod J; 2006 Apr; 32(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 16603041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
