These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17052649)

  • 21. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
    Gergi R; Sabbagh C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the shaping ability of RaCe and FlexMaster rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals.
    Merrett SJ; Bryant ST; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):960-2. PubMed ID: 16982273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
    Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
    Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
    Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effectiveness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria.
    Card SJ; Sigurdsson A; Orstavik D; Trope M
    J Endod; 2002 Nov; 28(11):779-83. PubMed ID: 12470024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
    Moore J; Fitz-Walter P; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2009 Dec; 42(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19912375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anatomic Endodontic Technology (AET)--a crown-down root canal preparation technique: basic concepts, operative procedure and instruments.
    Riitano F
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):575-87. PubMed ID: 16011778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A novel technique for the removal of fractured instruments in the apical third of curved root canals.
    Rahimi M; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 19228217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of shaft design on the shaping ability of 3 nickel-titanium rotary systems by means of spiral computerized tomography.
    Versiani MA; Pascon EA; de Sousa CJ; Borges MA; Sousa-Neto MD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 18424117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of three nickel-titanium rotary file techniques on infected root dentin reduction.
    Chuste-Guillot MP; Badet C; Peli JF; Perez F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 16876071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The LightSpeed system.
    Barbakow F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Jan; 48(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 15066510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Crack initiation on the apical root surface caused by three different nickel-titanium rotary files at different working lengths.
    Adorno CG; Yoshioka T; Suda H
    J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):522-5. PubMed ID: 21419302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of maintaining apical patency on canal transportation.
    Tsesis I; Amdor B; Tamse A; Kfir A
    Int Endod J; 2008 May; 41(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 18312378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals.
    Veltri M; Mollo A; Mantovani L; Pini P; Balleri P; Grandini S
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):610-6. PubMed ID: 16104974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.