BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17053019)

  • 1. Bias in occupational epidemiology studies.
    Pearce N; Checkoway H; Kriebel D
    Occup Environ Med; 2007 Aug; 64(8):562-8. PubMed ID: 17053019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures.
    Blair A; Stewart P; Lubin JH; Forastiere F
    Am J Ind Med; 2007 Mar; 50(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 17096363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of the healthy worker effect in occupational epidemiology.
    Li CY; Sung FC
    Occup Med (Lond); 1999 May; 49(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 10474913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological problems of time-related variables in occupational cohort studies.
    Pearce N
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1992; 40 Suppl 1():S43-54. PubMed ID: 1626105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Definition, sources, magnitude, effect modifiers, and strategies of reduction of the healthy worker effect.
    Choi BC
    J Occup Med; 1992 Oct; 34(10):979-88. PubMed ID: 1403198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Healthy worker survivor bias: implications of truncating follow-up at employment termination.
    Picciotto S; Brown DM; Chevrier J; Eisen EA
    Occup Environ Med; 2013 Oct; 70(10):736-42. PubMed ID: 23873985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evolving concept of the healthy worker survivor effect.
    Arrighi HM; Hertz-Picciotto I
    Epidemiology; 1994 Mar; 5(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 8172994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confounding by time since hire in internal comparisons of cumulative exposure in occupational cohort studies.
    Flanders WD; Cárdenas VM; Austin H
    Epidemiology; 1993 Jul; 4(4):336-41. PubMed ID: 8347744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Environment and health in Gela (Sicily): present knowledge and prospects for future studies].
    Musmeci L; Bianchi F; Carere M; Cori L
    Epidemiol Prev; 2009; 33(3 Suppl 1):7-12. PubMed ID: 19776462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Healthy worker effect in morbidity studies.
    Eisen EA
    Med Lav; 1995; 86(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 7659038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Epidemiological evidence and misclassification].
    Gianicolo EA; Mangia C; Cervino M; Bruni A; Andreassi MG; Latini G
    Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(5):274. PubMed ID: 27764921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Micro-epidemiology of the healthy worker effect?
    Heederik D
    Occup Environ Med; 2006 Feb; 63(2):83. PubMed ID: 16421384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The healthy worker survivor effect and mortality at two automotive engine manufacturing plants.
    Park RM
    Am J Ind Med; 1996 Dec; 30(6):655-63. PubMed ID: 8914712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Information bias in epidemiological studies with a special focus on obstetrics and gynecology.
    Kesmodel US
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):417-423. PubMed ID: 29453880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Definition, characteristics and methods of reducing the healthy worker effect].
    Sobala W
    Med Pr; 2008; 59(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 18663895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian modelling of lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure adjusted for unmeasured confounding by smoking.
    de Vocht F; Kromhout H; Ferro G; Boffetta P; Burstyn I
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Aug; 66(8):502-8. PubMed ID: 19060029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias magnification in ecologic studies: a methodological investigation.
    Webster TF
    Environ Health; 2007 Jul; 6():17. PubMed ID: 17615079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases.
    Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 1996 Dec; 25(6):1107-16. PubMed ID: 9027513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.