224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17053200)
1. Ductal carcinoma in situ: computer-aided detection in screening mammography.
Pai VR; Gregory NE; Swinford AE; Rebner M
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 17053200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Retrospective analysis of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system in full-field digital mammography in correlation to tumor histology].
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1103-9. PubMed ID: 16021542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting.
Birdwell RL; Bandodkar P; Ikeda DM
Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):451-7. PubMed ID: 16040901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.
Fenton JJ; Taplin SH; Carney PA; Abraham L; Sickles EA; D'Orsi C; Berns EA; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Barlow WE; Elmore JG
N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(14):1399-409. PubMed ID: 17409321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening breast MR imaging in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ.
Sung JS; Malak SF; Bajaj P; Alis R; Dershaw DD; Morris EA
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):414-20. PubMed ID: 21900617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson SK; Adler D; Nees AV; Shen J
Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16801362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic features of local recurrence in women who have undergone breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Liberman L; Van Zee KJ; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Samli B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):489-93. PubMed ID: 9016233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: variability in cues.
Baker JA; Lo JY; Delong DM; Floyd CE
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 15358850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.
Bluekens AM; Holland R; Karssemeijer N; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 23033499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ductal carcinoma in situ presenting as a stellate lesion on mammography.
Reiff DB; Cooke J; Griffin M; Given-Wilson R
Clin Radiol; 1994 Jun; 49(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 8045063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology.
Brem RF; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Hoffmeister JW; Desimio MP
Cancer; 2005 Sep; 104(5):931-5. PubMed ID: 16047331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between mammographic screening intervals and size and histology of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Carlson KL; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Kleer CG; Oberman HA; Wilson TE; Pollak EW; Rochester AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):313-7. PubMed ID: 9930774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
