These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17054536)

  • 1. Measuring uncertainty importance: investigation and comparison of alternative approaches.
    Borgonovo E
    Risk Anal; 2006 Oct; 26(5):1349-61. PubMed ID: 17054536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity analysis of a two-dimensional probabilistic risk assessment model using analysis of variance.
    Mokhtari A; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2005 Dec; 25(6):1511-29. PubMed ID: 16506979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation and recommendation of sensitivity analysis methods for application to Stochastic Human Exposure and Dose Simulation models.
    Mokhtari A; Christopher Frey H; Zheng J
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(6):491-506. PubMed ID: 16519411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods.
    Frey HC; Patil SR
    Risk Anal; 2002 Jun; 22(3):553-78. PubMed ID: 12088234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater treatment plant model applications: prioritizing sources of uncertainty.
    Sin G; Gernaey KV; Neumann MB; van Loosdrecht MC; Gujer W
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):639-51. PubMed ID: 20828785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of sensitivity analysis methods based on applications to a food safety risk assessment model.
    Patil SR; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):573-85. PubMed ID: 15209931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining the cost of reducing uncertainty with the selection of risk assessment models for remediation decision of site contamination.
    Chen YC; Ma HW
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar; 141(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16926066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epistemic uncertainty in the ranking and categorization of probabilistic safety assessment model elements: issues and findings.
    Borgonovo E
    Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):983-1001. PubMed ID: 18554270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying key parameters in cost-effectiveness analysis using value of information: a comparison of methods.
    Groot Koerkamp B; Myriam Hunink MG; Stijnen T; Weinstein MC
    Health Econ; 2006 Apr; 15(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 16389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When does information about probability count in choices under risk?
    Tyszka T; Zaleskiewicz T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1623-36. PubMed ID: 17184402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing the risk of uncertain threshold responses: comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches.
    Lempert RJ; Collins MT
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):1009-26. PubMed ID: 17958508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods for assessing uncertainty in fundamental assumptions and associated models for cancer risk assessment.
    Small MJ
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1289-308. PubMed ID: 18844862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty in prediction of disinfection performance.
    Neumann MB; von Gunten U; Gujer W
    Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(11):2371-8. PubMed ID: 17433404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Operationalising uncertainty in data and models for integrated water resources management.
    Blind MW; Refsgaard JC
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(9):1-12. PubMed ID: 18025725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system.
    van der Sluijs JP; Craye M; Funtowicz S; Kloprogge P; Ravetz J; Risbey J
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):481-92. PubMed ID: 15876219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using probabilistic terrorism risk modeling for regulatory benefit-cost analysis: application to the Western hemisphere travel initiative in the land environment.
    Willis HH; LaTourrette T
    Risk Anal; 2008 Apr; 28(2):325-39. PubMed ID: 18419652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uncertainty analysis based on probability bounds (p-box) approach in probabilistic safety assessment.
    Karanki DR; Kushwaha HS; Verma AK; Ajit S
    Risk Anal; 2009 May; 29(5):662-75. PubMed ID: 19302279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moment-independent sensitivity analysis using copula.
    Wei P; Lu Z; Song J
    Risk Anal; 2014 Feb; 34(2):210-22. PubMed ID: 24024936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.