298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17054537)
1. Uncertain numbers and uncertainty in the selection of input distributions--consequences for a probabilistic risk assessment of contaminated land.
Sander P; Bergbäck B; Oberg T
Risk Anal; 2006 Oct; 26(5):1363-75. PubMed ID: 17054537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.
Ritter L; Solomon K; Sibley P; Hall K; Keen P; Mattu G; Linton B
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2002 Jan; 65(1):1-142. PubMed ID: 11809004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination.
Baudrit C; Guyonnet D; Dubois D
J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):72-84. PubMed ID: 17321003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using Monte Carlo simulations in public health risk assessments: estimating and presenting full distributions of risk.
Burmaster DE; von Stackelberg K
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1991 Oct; 1(4):491-512. PubMed ID: 1824330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uncertainty characterization approaches for risk assessment of DBPs in drinking water: a review.
Chowdhury S; Champagne P; McLellan PJ
J Environ Manage; 2009 Apr; 90(5):1680-91. PubMed ID: 19167150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncertainty in biokinetic parameters on bioremediation: health risks and economic implications.
Wethasinghe C; Yuen ST; Kaluarachchi JJ; Hughes R
Environ Int; 2006 Apr; 32(3):312-23. PubMed ID: 16055190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model comparison for risk assessment: a case study of contaminated groundwater.
Chen YC; Ma HW
Chemosphere; 2006 May; 63(5):751-61. PubMed ID: 16213568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncertainty analysis based on probability bounds (p-box) approach in probabilistic safety assessment.
Karanki DR; Kushwaha HS; Verma AK; Ajit S
Risk Anal; 2009 May; 29(5):662-75. PubMed ID: 19302279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Examination of the uncertainty in contaminant fate and transport modeling: a case study in the Venice Lagoon.
Sommerfreund J; Arhonditsis GB; Diamond ML; Frignani M; Capodaglio G; Gerino M; Bellucci L; Giuliani S; Mugnai C
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Mar; 73(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 19493571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards quantitative uncertainty assessment for cancer risks: central estimates and probability distributions of risk in dose-response modeling.
Kopylev L; Chen C; White P
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 17905499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining the cost of reducing uncertainty with the selection of risk assessment models for remediation decision of site contamination.
Chen YC; Ma HW
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar; 141(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16926066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A combined Monte Carlo and possibilistic approach to uncertainty propagation in event tree analysis.
Baraldi P; Zio E
Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1309-26. PubMed ID: 18631304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integration of probabilistic exposure assessment and probabilistic hazard characterization.
van der Voet H; Slob W
Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):351-71. PubMed ID: 17511703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parameter uncertainty analysis of the non-point source pollution in the Daning River watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China.
Shen Z; Hong Q; Yu H; Liu R
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Nov; 405(1-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 18639918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A probabilistic arsenic exposure assessment for children who contact chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated playsets and decks, Part 2: Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses.
Xue J; Zartarian VG; Ozkaynak H; Dang W; Glen G; Smith L; Stallings C
Risk Anal; 2006 Apr; 26(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 16573638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probabilistic dose-response modeling: case study using dichloromethane PBPK model results.
Marino DJ; Starr TB
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):285-300. PubMed ID: 17949874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simulations in health risk assessment.
Biesiada M
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2001; 14(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 11885924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncertainty distribution associated with estimating a proportion in microbial risk assessment.
Miconnet N; Cornu M; Beaufort A; Rosso L; Denis JB
Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15787755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative risk assessment of Cryptosporidium in surface water treatment.
Medema GJ; Hoogenboezem W; van der Veer AJ; Ketelaars HA; Hijnen WA; Nobel PJ
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 12639036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Representation, propagation, and decision issues in risk analysis under incomplete probabilistic information.
Dubois D
Risk Anal; 2010 Mar; 30(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 20487395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
