285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17054546)
21. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for non-gastroenterologists: what you need to know.
Nallamothu G; Hilden K; Adler DG
Hosp Pract (1995); 2011 Apr; 39(2):70-80. PubMed ID: 21576899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of ERCP in patients with pancreatico-biliary problems in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
Alnusair MM; DeMagalhaes-Silverman M; Silverman WB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Apr; 63(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 16564868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients seen in a referral center for suspected biliary and pancreatic disease.
Sahai AV; Devonshire D; Yeoh KG; Kay C; Feldman D; Willner I; Farber J; Patel R; Tamasky PR; Cunningham JT; Trus T; Hawes RH; Cotton PB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jul; 96(7):2074-80. PubMed ID: 11467634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Findings on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and pancreatic function test in suspected chronic pancreatitis and negative cross-sectional imaging.
Parsi MA; Conwell DL; Zuccaro G; Stevens T; Lopez R; Dumot JA; Vargo JJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Dec; 6(12):1432-6. PubMed ID: 19081531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in predicted severe acute biliary pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study.
van Santvoort HC; Besselink MG; de Vries AC; Boermeester MA; Fischer K; Bollen TL; Cirkel GA; Schaapherder AF; Nieuwenhuijs VB; van Goor H; Dejong CH; van Eijck CH; Witteman BJ; Weusten BL; van Laarhoven CJ; Wahab PJ; Tan AC; Schwartz MP; van der Harst E; Cuesta MA; Siersema PD; Gooszen HG; van Erpecum KJ;
Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 19561460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Owens GR; Shutz SM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):265-6. PubMed ID: 10084882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Is the supine position as safe and effective as the prone position for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? A prospective randomized study.
Terruzzi V; Radaelli F; Meucci G; Minoli G
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1211-4. PubMed ID: 16329019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [A meta-analysis of clinical efficiency of two methodologies of cholangiopancreatography].
Hou J; Zhan J; Yu Z; Li CQ; Zhang SN; Liang HL
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 45(11):900-3. PubMed ID: 17313875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of EUS and ERCP in the investigation with suspected biliary obstruction caused by choledocholithiasis: a randomized study.
Lee YT; Chan FK; Leung WK; Chan HL; Wu JC; Yung MY; Ng EK; Lau JY; Sung JJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Apr; 67(4):660-8. PubMed ID: 18155205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography catheter and accessory exchange using a short hydrophilic guide wire: a prospective study.
Papachristou GI; Baron TH; Gleeson F; Levy MJ; Topazian MD
Endoscopy; 2006 Nov; 38(11):1133-6. PubMed ID: 17111336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP.
Soto JA; Yucel EK; Barish MA; Chuttani R; Ferrucci JT
Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 8633178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective comparison study.
Pungpapong S; Wallace MB; Woodward TA; Noh KW; Raimondo M
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 17198070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones].
Norero E; Norero B; Huete A; Pimentel F; Cruz F; Ibáñez L; Martínez J; Jarufe N
Rev Med Chil; 2008 May; 136(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 18769807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Bailey AA; Bourke MJ; Williams SJ; Walsh PR; Murray MA; Lee EY; Kwan V; Lynch PM
Endoscopy; 2008 Apr; 40(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 18389448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does intravenous glucagon improve common bile duct visualisation during magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Results in 42 patients.
Dalal PU; Howlett DC; Sallomi DF; Marchbank ND; Watson GM; Marr A; Dunk AA; Smith AD
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 49(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 14962656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study.
Colton JB; Curran CC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Sep; 70(3):457-67. PubMed ID: 19482278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography of biliary system abnormalities in children.
Fitoz S; Erden A; Boruban S
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 17320775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. ERCP is safe and effective in patients 80 years of age and older compared with younger patients.
Fritz E; Kirchgatterer A; Hubner D; Aschl G; Hinterreiter M; Stadler B; Knoflach P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6):899-905. PubMed ID: 17140895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can MRCP replace ERCP for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis?
Kamisawa T; Tu Y; Egawa N; Tsuruta K; Okamoto A; Kodama M; Kamata N
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(3):381-4. PubMed ID: 18437450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Weber C; Kuhlencordt R; Grotelueschen R; Wedegaertner U; Ang TL; Adam G; Soehendra N; Seitz U
Endoscopy; 2008 Sep; 40(9):739-45. PubMed ID: 18698533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
