100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1705494)
1. Contextual analysis and intermediate cell markers enhance high-resolution cell image analysis for automated cervical smear diagnosis.
Zahniser DJ; Wong KL; Brenner JF; Ball HG; Garcia GL; Hutchinson ML
Cytometry; 1991; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 1705494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined malignancy associated change and contextual analysis for computerized classification of cervical cell monolayers.
Isenstein LM; Zahniser DJ; Hutchinson ML
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Sep; 9(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 7492519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thionine-Feulgen-Congo red staining of cervical smears for the BioPEPR image-analysis system.
Oud PS; Zahniser DJ; Raaijmakers MC; Vooijs PG; Van de Walle RT
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Dec; 3(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 6174058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of contextual analysis for computer classification of cervical smears.
Garcia GL; Kuklinski WS; Zahniser DJ; Oud PS; Vooys PG; Brenner JF
Cytometry; 1987 Mar; 8(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 3556101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three different methods for automated classification of cervical cells.
Palcic B; MacAulay C; Shlien S; Treurniet W; Tezcan H; Anderson G
Anal Cell Pathol; 1992 Nov; 4(6):429-41. PubMed ID: 1280993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image analysis in cytology: DNA-histogramming versus cervical smear prescreening.
Bengtsson EW; Nordin B
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1993; 51(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 8338254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cell surplus on sampling devices after routine cervical cytologic smears. A study of residual cell populations.
Goodman A; Hutchinson ML
J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):239-41. PubMed ID: 8728075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Image analysis study of squamous epithelial cells in cytological smears of the uterine cervix].
Bergander S; König R; Geissler U
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(16):1039-45. PubMed ID: 2220178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. LEYTAS analysis of cytological specimens: the results of thousand cervical smears.
Goyarts-Veldstra L; van Driel-Kulker AM; Ploem-Zaaijer JJ; Meyer F; Ploem JS
Microsc Acta Suppl; 1983; 6():147-60. PubMed ID: 6578401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subvisual chromatin changes in cervical epithelium measured by texture image analysis and correlated with HPV.
Guillaud M; Adler-Storthz K; Malpica A; Staerkel G; Matisic J; Van Niekirk D; Cox D; Poulin N; Follen M; Macaulay C
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S16-23. PubMed ID: 16188299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Malignancy associated changes in cervical smears: systematic changes in cytometric features with the grade of dysplasia.
Guillaud M; Doudkine A; Garner D; MacAulay C; Palcic B
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Oct; 9(3):191-204. PubMed ID: 8562458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: cytologic findings in 13 cases.
Zhou C; Hayes MM; Clement PB; Thomson TA
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):281-8. PubMed ID: 9801202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of malignancy-associated changes of the cervical epithelium in a hierarchic classification concept.
Haroske G; Bergander S; König R; Meyer W
Anal Cell Pathol; 1990 Apr; 2(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 2275865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two Papanicolaou staining procedures for automated prescreening.
Soost HJ; Falter EW; Otto K
Anal Quant Cytol; 1979; 1(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 94777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Studies on Papanicolaou staining. I. Visible-light spectra of stained cervical cells.
Galbraith W; Marshall PN; Lee ES; Bacus JW
Anal Quant Cytol; 1979; 1(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 94521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Papanicolaou staining and Feulgen staining for automated prescreening.
Soost HJ; Brem W; Höbel W; Otto K; Schwarz G
Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Mar; 5(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 6189437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated prescreening of conventionally prepared cervical smears: a feasibility study.
Bartoo GT; Lee JS; Bartels PH; Kiviat NB; Nelson AC
Lab Invest; 1992 Jan; 66(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 1731146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognition of atypical reserve cell hyperplasia in cervical smears and its diagnostic significance.
Boon ME; van Dunné FM; Vardaxis NJ
Mod Pathol; 1995 Sep; 8(7):786-94. PubMed ID: 8539239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined analysis of cervical smears. Cytopathology, image cytometry and in situ hybridization.
Multhaupt H; Bruder E; Elit L; Rothblat I; Warhol M
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 8388610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
