251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17055679)
1. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating mutation rates from paternity casework.
Vicard P; Dawid AP; Mortera J; Lauritzen SL
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jan; 2(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 19083784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian networks for evaluating forensic DNA profiling evidence: a review and guide to literature.
Biedermann A; Taroni F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 21775236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for paternity cases with allelic dependencies.
Hepler AB; Weir BS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):166-75. PubMed ID: 19079769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resolving paternity relationships using X-chromosome STRs and Bayesian networks.
Hatsch D; Keyser C; Hienne R; Bertrand L
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):895-7. PubMed ID: 17553082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A statistical treatment of biases affecting the estimation of mutation rates.
Vicard P; Dawid AP
Mutat Res; 2004 Mar; 547(1-2):19-33. PubMed ID: 15013695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of DNA-based identification software by computation of pedigree likelihood ratios.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 20727843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient maximum likelihood pedigree reconstruction.
Cowell RG
Theor Popul Biol; 2009 Dec; 76(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 19781561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On statistical analysis of forensic DNA: theory, methods and computer programs.
Fung WK; Hu YQ; Chung YK
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Oct; 162(1-3):17-23. PubMed ID: 16870375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers.
Egeland T; Sheehan N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19083824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Joint Bayesian analysis of forensic mixtures.
Pascali VL; Merigioli S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):735-48. PubMed ID: 22948016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Probabilistic expert systems for forensic inference from DNA markers in horses: applications to confirm genealogies with lack of genetic data.
Dobosz M; Bocci C; Bonuglia M; Grasso C; Merigioli S; Russo A; De Iuliis P
J Hered; 2010; 101(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 19939967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.
Krawczak M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A genetic factor model for the statistical analysis of multilocus DNA fingerprints.
Krawczak M; Bockel B
Electrophoresis; 1992; 13(1-2):10-7. PubMed ID: 1587248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Informativeness of genetic markers for pairwise relationship and relatedness inference.
Wang J
Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):300-21. PubMed ID: 16388833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PedExpert: a computer program for the application of Bayesian networks to human paternity testing.
Gomes RR; Campos SV; Pena SD
Genet Mol Res; 2009; 8(1):273-83. PubMed ID: 19291876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of DNA tests: a decision perspective.
Taroni F; Bozza S; Bernard M; Champod C
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17209907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A general approach to power calculation for relationship testing.
Egeland T; Pinto N; Vigeland MD
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():186-90. PubMed ID: 23810238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using object oriented bayesian networks to model linkage, linkage disequilibrium and mutations between STR markers.
Kling D; Egeland T; Mostad P
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43873. PubMed ID: 22984448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
